Journal of Applied Physiology Millar Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (April 16, 2004). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01299.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/2/535    most recent
01299.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Durand, S.
Right arrow Articles by Crandall, C. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Durand, S.
Right arrow Articles by Crandall, C. G
Submitted on December 4, 2003
Accepted on April 8, 2004

Evidence of a myogenic response in vasomotor control of forearm and palm cutaneous microcirculations

Sylvain Durand1, Rong Zhang2, Jian Cui1, Thad E Wilson1, and Craig G Crandall2*

1 Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
2 Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: craigcrandall{at}texashealth.org.

Previous investigations of autoregulatory mechanisms in the control of skin blood flow suffer from the possibility of interfering effects of the autonomic nervous system. To address this question, in 11 subjects cutaneous vascular responses were measured during acute changes in perfusion pressure (using Valsalva maneuver; VM) before and after ganglionic blockade via systemic trimethaphan infusion. Cutaneous vascular conductance at baseline (CVCbase) and during the last 5 seconds of the VM (CVCVM) were measured from forearm (non-glabrous) and palm (glabrous) skin. During the VM without ganglionic blockade, when compared to CVCbase, CVCVM decreased significantly at the palm (0.79±0.17 to 0.55±0.17 AU/mmHg, P=0.002) but was unchanged at the forearm (0.13±0.02 to 0.16±0.02 AU/mmHg, P=0.50). After ganglionic blockade, VM induced pronounced decreases in perfusion pressure, which resulted in significant increases in CVCVM at both forearm (0.19±0.03 to 0.31±0.07 AU/mmHg, P=0.008) and palm (1.84±0.29 to 2.76±0.63 AU/mmHg, P=0.003) sites. These results suggest that devoid of autonomic control both glabrous and non-glabrous skin are capable of exhibiting vasomotor autoregulation during pronounced reductions in perfusion pressure.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. E. Wilson, R. Zhang, B. D. Levine, and C. G. Crandall
Dynamic autoregulation of cutaneous circulation: differential control in glabrous versus nonglabrous skin
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): H385 - H391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.