|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Intensive Care, Nambour Hospital, Nambour, Queensland, Australia
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: chris_anstey{at}health.qld.gov.au.
Currently, three strong ion models exist for the determination of plasma pH. Mathematically, they vary
in their treatment of weak acids and this study was designed to determine if any significant differences
exist in the simulated performance of these models. The models were subjected to a 'metabolic' stress
either in the form of variable strong ion difference / fixed weak acid effect, or vice versa, and compared
over the range 25
PCO2
135mmHg. The predictive equations for each model were iteratively solved for pH at each PCO2 step and the results plotted as a series of log(PCO2) / pH titration curves. The results were analysed for linearity using ordinary least squares regression and for collinearity using correlation. In every case, the results revealed a linear relationship between log(PCO2) and pH over the range 6.8
pH
7.8, and no significant difference between the curve predictions under 'metabolic' stress. The curves were statistically collinear. Ultimately, their clinical utility will be determined both by acceptance of the strong ion framework for describing acid-base physiology and by the ease of measurement of the independent model parameters.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Kurtz, J. Kraut, V. Ornekian, and M. K. Nguyen Acid-base analysis: a critique of the Stewart and bicarbonate-centered approaches Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): F1009 - F1031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |