| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
2 Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
3 Dipartimento di Elettronica, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kk375{at}cornell.edu.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of selected physiological parameters on amplitude cancellation in the simulated surface EMG and the consequences for spike-triggered averages of motor unit potentials derived from the interference and rectified EMG signals. The surface EMG was simulated from prescribed recruitment and rate coding characteristics of a motor unit population. The potentials of the motor units were detected on the skin over a hand muscle with a bipolar electrode configuration. Averages derived from the EMG signal were generated using the discharge times for each of the 24 motor units with lowest recruitment thresholds from a population of 120 across three conditions: 1) excitation level; 2) motor unit conduction velocity; and 3) motor unit synchronization. The area of the surface-detected potential was compared with potentials averaged from the interference, rectified, and no-cancellation EMGs. The no-cancellation EMG comprised motor unit potentials that were rectified before they were summed, thereby preventing cancellation between the opposite phases of the potentials. The percent decrease in area of potentials extracted from the rectified EMG was linearly related to the amount of amplitude cancellation in the interference EMG signal, with the amount of cancellation influenced by variation in excitation level and motor unit conduction velocity. Motor unit synchronization increased potentials derived from both the rectified and interference EMG signals, although cancellation limited the increase in area for both potentials. These findings document the influence of amplitude cancellation on motor unit potentials averaged from the surface EMG and the consequences for using the procedure to characterize motor unit properties.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Farina, C. Cescon, F. Negro, and R. M. Enoka Amplitude Cancellation of Motor-Unit Action Potentials in the Surface Electromyogram Can Be Estimated With Spike-Triggered Averaging J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 431 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Klass, M. Levenez, R. M. Enoka, and J. Duchateau Spinal Mechanisms Contribute to Differences in the Time to Failure of Submaximal Fatiguing Contractions Performed With Different Loads J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1096 - 1104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Taube, C. Leukel, M. Schubert, M. Gruber, T. Rantalainen, and A. Gollhofer Differential Modulation of Spinal and Corticospinal Excitability During Drop Jumps J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1243 - 1252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. J. Dartnall, M. A. Nordstrom, and J. G. Semmler Motor Unit Synchronization Is Increased in Biceps Brachii After Exercise-Induced Damage to Elbow Flexor Muscles J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 1008 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. P. Saboisky, J. E. Butler, D. K. McKenzie, R. B. Gorman, J. A. Trinder, D. P. White, and S. C. Gandevia Neural drive to human genioglossus in obstructive sleep apnoea J. Physiol., November 15, 2007; 585(1): 135 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. G. Keenan and F. J. Valero-Cuevas Experimentally Valid Predictions of Muscle Force and EMG in Models of Motor-Unit Function Are Most Sensitive to Neural Properties J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1581 - 1590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
