Journal of Applied Physiology Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (February 17, 2005). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01268.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/6/2268    most recent
01268.2004v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montmerle, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sundblad, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Montmerle, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sundblad, P.
Submitted on November 10, 2004
Accepted on February 15, 2005

Residual heterogeneity of intra- and inter-regional pulmonary perfusion in short-term microgravity

Stephanie Montmerle1*, Dag Linnarsson1, and Patrik Sundblad1

1 Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, section of Environmental Physiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: stephanie.montmerle{at}fyfa.ki.se.

We hypothesized that the perfusion heterogeneity in the human, upright lung is determined by non-gravitational more than gravitational factors. Twelve and six subjects were studied during two series of parabolic flights. We used cardiogenic oscillations of O2 / SF6 (hexafluoride) (COS O2 / SF6) as an indirect estimate of intra-regional perfusion heterogeneity (series 1) and phase IV amplitude (P4) as a indirect estimate of inter-regional perfusion heterogeneity (series 2). A rebreathing - breath holding - expiration maneuver was performed. Inflight, breath holding and expiration were performed either in microgravity (0 G) or in hypergravity. Controls were performed at normal gravity (1 G). In series 1, expiration was performed at 0 G. COS O2 / SF6 was 19% lower when breath holding was performed at 0 G than when breath holding was performed at 1 G (means ± SD, 1.7 ± 0.3 and 2.3 ± 0.6 % units) (P = 0.044). When breath holding was performed at 1.8 G, values did not differ from 1 G control (2.6[plusmn]] 0.8 % units, P = 0.15) but they were 17% larger at 1.8 G than at 1 G. In series 2, expiration was performed at 1.7 G. P4 changed with gravity (P < 0.001). When breath-holding was performed at 0 G, P4 values were 45 ± 46% of control. When breath-holding was performed at 1.7 G, P4 values were 183 ± 101% of control. We conclude that more than half of indices of perfusion heterogeneity at 1 G are caused by non-gravitational mechanisms.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. Glenny
Counterpoint: Gravity is not the major factor determining the distribution of blood flow in the healthy human lung
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2008; 104(5): 1533 - 1535.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. Montmerle and D. Linnarsson
Effects of gravity and blood volume shifts on cardiogenic oscillations in respired gas
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2005; 99(3): 931 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.