Journal of Applied Physiology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (March 3, 2005). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01260.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/1/181    most recent
01260.2004v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Stengel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Engelke, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by von Stengel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Engelke, K.
Submitted on November 8, 2004
Accepted on February 24, 2005

Power training is more effective than strength training for maintaining bone mineral density in postmenopausal women

Simon von Stengel1*, Wolfgang K Kemmler1, Dirk Lauber2, Renate Pintag1, Carola Beeskow1, Juergen Weineck2, Willi A Kalender1, and Klaus Engelke1

1 Institute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen, Germany
2 Institute of Sports Science, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: simon.von.stengel{at}imp.uni-erlangen.de.

Physical exercise has a favourable impact on bones, but optimum training strategies are still under discussion. In this study we compared the effect of slow and fast resistance exercises on various osteodensitometric parameters. 53 postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to a strength (ST) or a power training group (PT). Both groups carried out a progressive resistance training, a gymnastics session, and a home training over a period of 12 months. During the resistance training the ST group used slow and the PT group fast movements, otherwise there were no training differences. All subjects were supplemented with Ca/Vit-D. At baseline and after 12 months, BMD was measured at the lumbar spine, proximal femur, and distal forearm by DXA. We also measured anthropometric data and maximum static strength. Frequency and grade of pain were assessed by questionnaire. After 12 months, significant between-group differences were observed for BMD at the lumbar spine (L1-L4) (p<0.05) and the total hip (p<0.05). While the PT group maintained BMD at the spine (+0.7±2.1%, n.s.) and the total hip (0.0±1.7%, n.s.), the ST group lost significantly at both sites (spine: -0.9±1.9%; p<0.05; total hip: -1.2±1.5%; p<0.01). No significant between-group differences were observed for anthropometric data, maximum strength, BMD of the forearm, or frequency/grade of pain. These findings suggest that power training is more effective than strength training in reducing bone loss in postmenopausal women.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary ApproachHome page
S. L. Manske, C. R. Lorincz, and R. F. Zernicke
Bone Health: Part 2, Physical Activity
Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach, July 1, 2009; 1(4): 341 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Aging HealthHome page
D. S. Bocalini, A. J. Serra, L. dos Santos, N. Murad, and R. F. Levy
Strength Training Preserves the Bone Mineral Density of Postmenopausal Women Without Hormone Replacement Therapy
J Aging Health, June 1, 2009; 21(3): 519 - 527.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
S. von Stengel, W. Kemmler, W. A Kalender, K. Engelke, and D. Lauber
Differential effects of strength versus power training on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a 2-year longitudinal study
Br. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2007; 41(10): 649 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.