Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (September 18, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01237.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/6/1725    most recent
01237.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slats, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sterk, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slats, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sterk, P. J.
Submitted on November 20, 2007
Accepted on September 15, 2008

Enhanced airway dilation by positive pressure inflation of the lungs compared to active deep inspiration in patients with asthma

Annelies M. Slats1*, Kirsten Janssen1, Ronald C. de Jeu1, Dirk T. van der Plas1, Robert Schot1, Joost G. van den Aardweg2, and Peter J. Sterk3

1 Dept. of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
2 Dept. Pulmonary Medicine, Medical Center Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands
3 Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Dept. of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a.m.slats{at}lumc.nl.

Introduction: Deep inspiration temporarily reduces induced airways obstruction in healthy subjects. This bronchodilatory effect of deep inspiration is impaired in asthma. Passive machine-assisted lung inflation may augment bronchodilation as compared to an active deep inspiration in patients with asthma by either opening closed airways or by reducing fluid flux across the airway wall during deep inspiration, and thereby increasing the tethering forces on the airway wall. Methods: We recruited 24 patients with asthma (18-46 yrs, FEV1 > 70% pred, PC20methacholine < 8 mg/ml), with either an impaired (n=12) or an intact (n=12) bronchodilatory response to deep inspiration (DI). Two methacholine challenges were performed on separate days. At a 50% increase in respiratory resistance (forced oscillation technique at 8 Hz) the change in resistance by a positive pressure inflation (computer driven syringe) or an active deep inspiration was measured in randomized order. Results: The reduction in resistance by positive pressure inflation was significantly greater than by active DI in the impaired DI response group (mean change ± SEM: -0.6 ± 0.1 vs. -0.03 ± 0.2 cmH2O/L/s, p = 0.002). No significant difference was found between positive pressure inflation and active DI in the intact DI response group (-0.6 ± 0.2 vs. -1.0 ± 0.3 cmH2O/L/s, p = 0.18). Conclusion: Positive pressure inflation of the lungs can significantly enhance deep inspiration-induced bronchodilation in patients with asthma.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.