|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Articles in PresS, published online ahead of print February 1, 2002
J Appl Physiol, 10.1152/jap.01231.2001
Submitted on December 14, 2001
Accepted on January 25, 2002
1 Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: afd3{at}po.cwru.edu.
Lower thoracic spinal cord stimulation (SCS) results in expiratory muscle activation and may be a useful method to restore an effective cough mechanism in patients with spinal cord injury. Stimulation applied on the dorsal epidural surface at the T9-T10 spinal cord level results in the greatest changes in airway pressure with a single electrode lead. In dogs, two groups of studies were performed to evaluate the mechanism of the expiratory muscle activation during T9-T10 level stimulation. In one group (n=4), expiratory muscle activation caudal to the stimulating electrode was monitored by evoked muscle compound action potentials (CAPs) from the internal intercostal muscles in the 10th, 11th and 12th interspaces, and portions of the external oblique innervated by the L1 and L2 motor roots. SCS, applied with single-shocks, resulted in short latency CAPs at T10 but not at more caudal levels. SCS resulted in long latency CAPs at each of the more caudal recording sites. SCS was also applied before and after sequential sectioning of the dorsal columns, lateral (LF) and ventral (VF) funiculi just below the T11 spinal cord level. Bilateral dorsal columns sectioning did not affect the short latency CAPs but abolished the long latency CAPs below the level of sectioning and also resulted in a fall in airway pressure generation from 58±2 to 31±4 cmH2O (p<0.01). Sectioning of the LF and VF resulted in only small further decrements in pressure generation. In the second group of animals (n=11), sequential spinal root sectioning was performed to assess their individual mechanical contribution to pressure generation. Section of the ventral roots from T8 thru T10 resulted in negligible changes while section of more caudal roots resulted in a progressive reduction in pressure generation. We conclude that: a) SCS at the T9-T10 level results in direct activation of spinal cord roots within 2-3 segments of the stimulating electrode, and activation of more distal roots via spinal cord pathways, and b) pathway activation of motor roots make a substantial contribution to pressure generation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. F. DiMarco and K. E. Kowalski Effects of chronic electrical stimulation on paralyzed expiratory muscles J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2008; 104(6): 1634 - 1640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Kowalski, J. R. Romaniuk, and A. F. DiMarco Changes in expiratory muscle function following spinal cord section J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2007; 102(4): 1422 - 1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. DiMarco, K. E. Kowalski, R. T. Geertman, and D. R. Hromyak Spinal Cord Stimulation: A New Method to Produce an Effective Cough in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2006; 173(12): 1386 - 1389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |