Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (August 16, 2002). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01170.2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/6/2018    most recent
01170.2001v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huso, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Swan, P. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huso, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Swan, P. D

Articles in PresS, published online ahead of print August 16, 2002
J Appl Physiol, 10.1152/jap.01170.2001
Submitted on November 27, 2001
Accepted on August 5, 2002

Creatine supplementation influences substrate utilization at rest

M. Erik Huso1, Jeffrey S Hampl1*, Carol S Johnston1, and Pamela D Swan2

1 Department of Nutrition, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ, USA
2 Department of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Jeff.Hampl{at}asu.edu.

The influence of creatine supplementation on substrate utilization during rest was investigated using a double-blind crossover design. Ten active men participated in 12 weeks of weight training and were given creatine and placebo (20 g/d for 4 d, then 2 g/d for 17 d) in two trials separated by a 4-week washout. Body composition, substrate utilization, and strength were assessed following week 2, 5, 9 and 12. Maximal isometric contraction (1-RM) leg press increased significantly (P < 0.05) following both treatments but 1-RM bench press was increased (33 kg ± 8, P < 0.05) only following creatine. Total body mass increased (1.6 kg ± 0.5, P < 0.05) after creatine but not after placebo. Significant (P < 0.05) increases in fat-free mass were found following both creatine (1.9 kg ± 0.8) and placebo (2.2 kg ± 0.7) supplementation. Fat mass did not change significantly with creatine, but decreased after the placebo trial (-2.4 kg ± 0.8, P < 0.05). Carbohydrate oxidation was increased by creatine (8.9% ± 4.0, P < 0.05), while there was a trend for increased RER after creatine supplementation (0.03 ± 0.01, P = 0.07). Changes in substrate oxidation may influence the inhibition of fat mass loss associated with creatine following weight training.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. L. Schmitt, A. Hotz-Wagenblatt, H. Klein, and W. Droge
Interdependent Regulation of Insulin Receptor Kinase Activity by ADP and Hydrogen Peroxide
J. Biol. Chem., February 4, 2005; 280(5): 3795 - 3801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.