Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (May 22, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01109.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/2/457    most recent
01109.2006v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, E.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Herzog, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, E.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Herzog, W.
Submitted on October 3, 2006
Accepted on May 16, 2008

Residual force enhancement exceeds the isometric force at optimal sarcomere length for optimized stretch conditions

Eun-Jeong Lee1 and Walter Herzog1*

1 Human Performance Lab., Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: walter{at}kin.ucalgary.ca.

Residual force enhancement (FE) following stretch of an activated muscle is a well accepted property of skeletal muscle contraction. However, the mechanism underlying FE remains unknown. A crucial assumption on which some proposed mechanisms are based is the idea that forces in the enhanced state cannot exceed the steady-state isometric force at a sarcomere length associated with optimal myofilament overlap. Although there are a number of studies in which forces in the enhanced state were compared to the corresponding isometric forces on the plateau of the force-length relationship, these studies either did not show enhanced forces above the plateau, or if they did, they lacked measurements of sarcomere lengths confirming the plateau region. Here, we revisited this question by optimizing stretch conditions and measuring the average sarcomere lengths in isolated fibers, and found that FE exceeded the maximal isometric reference force obtained at the plateau of the force-length relationship consistently (mean±SD: 4.8±2.1%) and by up to 10%. When subtracting the passive component of FE from the total FE, the enhanced forces remained greater than the isometric plateau force (mean±SD: 4.3±2.0%). Calcium-induced increases in passive forces, known to be present in single fibers and myofibrils, are too small to account for the FE observed here. We conclude that FE cannot be explained exclusively with stretch-induced development of sarcomere length non-uniformities, that FE in single fibers may be associated with the recruitment of additional contractile force, and that isometric steady-state forces in the enhanced state are not uniquely determined by sarcomere lengths.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.