Journal of Applied Physiology Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (January 16, 2004). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01107.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/6/2139    most recent
01107.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stoner, L.
Right arrow Articles by McCully, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stoner, L.
Right arrow Articles by McCully, K.
Submitted on October 13, 2003
Accepted on January 6, 2004

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BLOOD VELOCITY AND CONDUIT ARTERY DIAMETER, AND THE EFFECTS OF SMOKING ON VASCULAR RESPONSIVENESS

Lee Stoner1*, Manning J Sabatier2, Kristy Edge2, and Kevin McCully2

1 Medical School, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
2 Exercise Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Lee79{at}uga.edu.

Transient changes in arterial diameter in response to transient ischemia-induced changes in arterial blood velocity have been used as an index of vascular health. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between blood velocity and diameter in the brachial artery using different methods of increasing blood velocity. Acute cigarette smoking was used with otherwise healthy young occasional smokers to determine the influence of endothelial-nitric oxide pathways on the arterial diameter-blood velocity relationship. Nine non-smokers and 12 occasional smokers (<1 pack/week) were tested. Blood flow to the forearm was manipulated to indirectly investigate the relationship between blood velocity and diameter in the brachial artery. Blood flow to forearm was manipulated through the use of: 1) 5 min ischemia; 2) handgrip exercise; 3) indirect local heating; and 4) 5 min ischemia plus indirect local heating. A strong relationship was observed between blood velocity and diameter independent of the method used to increase blood velocity (R2=0.89). The mean slope of the velocity-diameter relationship was not different between non-smokers and occasional smokers who abstained from smoking at least 2 days. Acute smoking did not alter the slope of the velocity-diameter relationship although the mean intercept was decreased as a result of consistent vasoconstriction (7-10%). The mechanisms by which smoking impairs vascular health are largely unknown. These findings differ from previous smoking studies which used chronic and/or heavier smokers. In conclusion the velocity-diameter relationship appears independent of the method for increasing velocity. Acute smoking in occasional smokers results in vasoconstriction without altering vascular responsiveness. The velocity-diameter relationship may be a useful measure of the progression of vascular disease.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
A. O Brubakk, D Duplancic, Z Valic, I Palada, A Obad, D Bakovic, U Wisloff, and Z Dujic
A single air dive reduces arterial endothelial function in man
J. Physiol., August 1, 2005; 566(3): 901 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. W. Wray, A. Uberoi, L. Lawrenson, and R. S. Richardson
Heterogeneous limb vascular responsiveness to shear stimuli during dynamic exercise in humans
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2005; 99(1): 81 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.