Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (March 13, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01069.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Video
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/5/1320    most recent
01069.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Finni, T.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Finni, T.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, S.
Submitted on October 8, 2007
Accepted on March 10, 2008

Mechanical behavior of the quadriceps femoris muscle tendon unit during low load contractions

Taija Finni1*, Marko Havu2, Shantanu Sinha3, Jussi-Pekka Usenius4, and Sulin Cheng5

1 Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland
2 Department of Biology of Physical Acitivity, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland
3 Radiology, UC-San Diego, San Diego, California, United States
4 Nomir Oy, Finland
5 Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Taija.Finni{at}sport.jyu.fi.

We examined the relationships between morphology and muscle-tendon dynamics of the quadriceps femoris muscle (QF) of 11 males using velocity-encoded phase-contrast MRI. Thigh muscle EMG and joint range of motion were first measured outside the MRI scanner during knee extension-flexion tasks that were performed at a rate of 40 times/minute with elastic bands providing peak resistance of 5.2 kp (SD 0.4) to the extension. The same movement was repeated inside the MRI scanner bore where tissue velocities and muscle morphology were recorded. The average displacement in the proximal and distal halves of the rectus femoris and vastus intermedius aponeuroses was different (p=0.049) reflecting shortening (1.6 %), but the tensile strain along the length of the aponeuroses was uniform. The aponeurosis behaviour varied among individuals and these individual patterns were best explained by the differences in relative cross-sectional area of RF to vastus muscles (r = 0.71, p = 0.014). During dynamic contraction considerable deformation of muscles in the axial plane caused an anatomic measure such as muscle thickness to change differently (decrease or increase) in different sites of measurement. For example, when analyzed from the axial images, the vastus lateralis thickness did not change (p = 0.946) in the frontal plane through femur but increased in a 45° oblique plane between the frontal and sagittal planes (p = 0.004). The present observations of the heterogeneity and individual behaviour emphasize the fact that single-point measurements do not always reflect the overall behaviour of muscle-tendon unit.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.