Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (December 10, 2004). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01045.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/5/1666    most recent
01045.2004v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacIntosh, B. R
Right arrow Articles by MacNaughton, M. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacIntosh, B. R
Right arrow Articles by MacNaughton, M. B
Submitted on September 21, 2004
Accepted on December 9, 2004

The Length-Dependence of Muscle Active Force: Considerations for Parallel Elastic Properties

Brian R MacIntosh1* and Meredith B MacNaughton2

1 Faculty of Kinsiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
2 Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: brian{at}kin.ucalgary.ca.

The purpose of this study was to choose between two popular models of skeletal muscle; the parallel elastic component is parallel with both the contractile element and the series elastic component (model A), or is parallel with only the contractile element (model B). Passive and total forces were obtained at a variety of muscle lengths for the medial gastrocnemius muscle in anesthetized rats. Passive force was measured prior to the contraction (passive A), or was estimated for the fascicle length (measured with sonomicrometry) at which peak total force occurred (passive B). Active force was peak total force minus passive force (A or B) at each fascicle or muscle length. Optimal length, that fascicle length at which active force is maximized, was 13.1±1.2 mm with passive A , and 14.0±1.1 mm with passive B (p<0.01). Furthermore, the relationship between double-pulse contraction force and length was broader when calculated with passive B than with passive A. When the muscle was held at a long length, passive force decreased due to stress-relaxation, with no change in fascicle length at the peak of the contraction and a smaller corresponding decrease in peak total force. There is no explanation for the apparent increase in active force that would be obtained when subtracting passive A from the peak total force. Therefore, to calculate active force, it is appropriate to subtract passive force measured at the fascicle length corresponding to the length at which peak total force occurs, not passive force measured at the length at which the contraction begins.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. A. Biewener and A. N. Ahn
Tired of fatigue? Factors affecting the force-length relationship of muscle
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2006; 101(1): 5 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. B. MacNaughton and B. R. MacIntosh
Reports of the length dependence of fatigue are greatly exaggerated
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2006; 101(1): 23 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.