Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (January 24, 2003). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01038.2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/6/2439    most recent
01038.2002v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, S. K
Right arrow Articles by Enoka, R. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, S. K
Right arrow Articles by Enoka, R. M
Submitted on November 13, 2002
Accepted on January 17, 2003

Activation among the elbow flexor muscles differs when maintaining arm position during a fatiguing contraction

Sandra K Hunter1*, Romuald Lepers2, Carol J MacGillis1, and Roger M Enoka1

1 Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
2 Faculte des Sciences du Sport, Universite de Bourgogne, Dijon, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: shunter{at}colorado.edu.

Twenty-four men (n = 11) and women (n = 13) supported an inertial load equivalent to 20% of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) force with the elbow flexor muscles for as long as possible while maintaining a constant elbow angle at 90 degrees. Endurance time did not differ on the three occasions that the task was performed (320 ± 149 s, P > 0.05), and there was no difference between women (360 ± 168 s) and men (273 ± 108 s, P = 0.11). The rate of increase in average EMG for the elbow flexor muscles was similar across sessions (P > 0.05). However, average EMG during the fatiguing task increased for the long head of biceps brachii, brachioradialis, and brachialis (P < 0.05), but not for the short head of biceps brachii. Furthermore, the average EMG for the brachialis was greater at the start and end of the contraction compared with the other elbow flexor muscles. The rate of bursts in EMG activity increased during the fatiguing contraction and was greater in brachialis (1.0 ± 0.2 bursts/min) compared with the other elbow flexor muscles (0.5 ± 0.1 bursts/min). The changes in the standard deviation of acceleration, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate during the fatiguing contractions were similar across sessions. These findings indicate that the EMG activity, which reflects the net excitatory and inhibitory input received by the motor neurons in the spinal cord, was not adaptable over repeat sessions for the maintain-position task. Furthermore, these results contrast those from a previous study (15) when the goal of the isometric contraction was to maintain a constant force. These results, from a series of studies on the elbow flexor muscles, indicate that the type of load supported during the fatiguing contraction influences the extent to which endurance time can change with repeat performances of the task.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.