Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (October 24, 2003). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01027.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/4/1541    most recent
01027.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leal-Campanario, R.
Right arrow Articles by Gruart, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leal-Campanario, R.
Right arrow Articles by Gruart, A.
Submitted on September 24, 2003
Accepted on October 16, 2003

Relative contributions of eyelid and eye-retraction motor systems to reflex and classically conditioned blink responses in the rabbit

Rocio Leal-Campanario1, Jose A Barradas-Bribiescas1, Jose M Delgado-Garcia1*, and Agnes Gruart1

1 Division de Neurociencias, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jmdelgar{at}dex.upo.es.

Early compensatory mechanisms between eyelid and eye-retraction motor systems following selective nerve and/or muscle lesions were studied in behaving rabbits. Reflex and conditioned eyelid responses were recorded in a) controls, and following b) facial nerve section, c) retractor bulbi muscle removal, and d) facial nerve section and retractor bulbi muscle removal. Animals were classically conditioned with a delayed paradigm using a tone (350 ms, 600 Hz, 90 dB) as conditioned stimulus, followed 250 ms later by an air puff (100 ms, 3 kg/cm2) as unconditioned stimulus. Conditioned eyelid responses generated in the absence of the facial motor system (i.e., by the almost sole action of the accessory abducens motor system) presented a wavy profile, due to the succession of eye-retraction movements. Learned eyelid responses generated in the absence of the eye-retraction motor system (i.e., by the almost exclusive action of the facial motor system) were similar to controls, but were reduced in amplitude and peak velocity. Finally, the isolated action of the extraocular recti muscle produced very small eyelid movements during both reflex and learned eyelid responses. Although each of these motor systems could act independently of the others, the motor result of their joint action did not coincide with the simple addition of their separate actions. Both facial and eye-retraction motor systems seemed to be necessary for normal eyelid closure during blinking in rabbits. Functional efforts to compensate for the lack of one of the involved systems during blinking could explain the (different) magnitude and profiles of reflex and learned eyelid responses evoked by the others.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. F. Lepora, E. Mavritsaki, J. Porrill, C. H. Yeo, C. Evinger, and P. Dean
Evidence From Retractor Bulbi EMG for Linearized Motor Control of Conditioned Nictitating Membrane Responses
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2074 - 2088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. Jimenez-Diaz, J. de Dios Navarro-Lopez, A. Gruart, and J. M. Delgado-Garcia
Role of Cerebellar Interpositus Nucleus in the Genesis and Control of Reflex and Conditioned Eyelid Responses
J. Neurosci., October 13, 2004; 24(41): 9138 - 9145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.