Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (January 12, 2006). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00997.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/5/1452    most recent
00997.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, P.
Right arrow Articles by Yokota, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, P.
Right arrow Articles by Yokota, H.
Submitted on August 18, 2005
Accepted on December 30, 2005

Diaphyseal Bone Formation in Murine Tibiae in Response to Knee Loading

Ping Zhang1, Shigeo M. Tanaka2, Hui Jiang1, Min Su1, and Hiroki Yokota1*

1 Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, and Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
2 Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hyokota{at}iupui.edu.

Mechanical stimulation is critical for bone architecture and bone mass. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of mechanical loads applied to the knee. The specific question was whether loads applied to the tibial epiphysis would enhance bone formation in the tibial diaphysis. Using C57/BL/6 mice, loads of 0.5 N were applied for 3 min per day for 3 days at 5, 10, or 15 Hz. Bone samples were harvested 13 days after the last loading. The strains were measured 13 ± 2 µstrains at 5 Hz in the diaphysis. The histomorphometric data in the diaphysis clearly showed enhanced bone formation. First, compared to nonloaded control the crosssectional cortical area was increased by 11% at 5 Hz and 8% at 10 Hz (both p < 0.05). Second, the cortical thickness was elevated by 12% at 5 Hz (p < 0.01) and 8% at 10 Hz (p < 0.05). Third, mineralizing surface (MS/BS), mineral apposition rate (MAR), and bone formation rate (BFR/BS) were increased at 5 Hz (p < 0.01 for MS/BS; p < 0.001 for MAR and BFR/BS) and at 10 Hz (p < 0.05 for MS/BS; p < 0.01 for MAR and BFR/BS). Bone formation was enhanced more extensively in the medial side than the lateral or the posterior side. The results reveal that knee loading is an effective means to enhance bone formation in the tibial diaphysis in a loadingfrequency dependent manner without inducing significant in situ strain at the site of bone formation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
P Zhang, G M Malacinski, and H Yokota
Joint loading modality: its application to bone formation and fracture healing
Br. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2008; 42(7): 556 - 560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. J. Warden
Breaking the rules for bone adaptation to mechanical loading
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2006; 100(5): 1441 - 1442.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.