|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Laboratoire Ergonomie Sportive et Performance - EA 3162, Universite de Toulon et du Var, LA GARDE, France
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: falgairette{at}univ-tln.fr.
This study aimed to evaluate potential gender differences in recovery of power output during repeated all-out cycling exercise. Twenty men and thirteen women performed 4 series of 2 sprints (Sp1, Sp2) of 8 s, separated by 15, 30, 60 and 120-s recovery. Peak power (Ppeak), power at the 8th second (P8s), total mechanical work (W) and time to Ppeak (tPpeak) were calculated for each sprint. Ppeak and W decreased significantly between Sp1 and Sp2 after 15-s recovery in both men (-6.4% and -9.4%, respectively) and women (-7.4% and -6.8%, respectively). tPpeak did not change between recovery durations but women reached their peak power more slowly than men (on average: 5.15 ± 1.2 s and 3.8 ± 1.2 s, respectively; P < 0.01). During Sp1 and Sp2, linear regressions from Ppeak to P8s showed a greater power decrease (%Ppeak) in women compared to men (P < 0.05). In conclusion, patterns of power output recovery between two consecutive short bouts were similar in men and women, in spite of lower overall performance and greater fatigability during sprints in women.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Mendez-Villanueva, J. Fernandez-Fernandez, and D. Bishop Exercise-induced homeostatic perturbations provoked by singles tennis match play with reference to development of fatigue Br. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2007; 41(11): 717 - 722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |