Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 3, 2005). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00960.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/3/800    most recent
00960.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, G. S.
Submitted on August 5, 2005
Accepted on October 31, 2005

Recovery of phrenic activity and ventilation following cervical spinal hemisection in rats

David D. Fuller1*, Francis J. Golder1, E. B. Olson, Jr.1, and Gordon S. Mitchell1

1 Department of Comparative Biosciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dfuller{at}phhp.ufl.edu.

We tested two hypotheses: 1) that the spontaneous enhancement of phrenic motor output below a C2 spinal hemisection (C2HS) is associated with plasticity in ventrolateral spinal inputs to phrenic motoneurons, and 2) that phrenic motor recovery in anesthetized rats after C2HS correlates with increased capacity to generate inspiratory volume during hypercapnia in unanesthetized rats. At 2 and 4 weeks post-C2HS, ipsilateral phrenic nerve activity was recorded in anesthetized, paralyzed, vagotomized and ventilated rats. Electrical stimulation of the ventrolateral funiculus contralateral to C2HS was used to activate crossed-spinal synaptic pathways phrenic motoneurons. Inspiratory phrenic burst amplitudes ipsilateral to C2HS were larger in the 4 vs. 2 week groups (p<0.05); however, no differences in spinally evoked compound phrenic action potentials could be detected. In unanesthetized rats, inspiratory volume and frequency were repeatedly quantified using barometric plethysmography at inspired CO2 fractions (FICO2) between 0.0 and 0.07 (FIO2=0.21, balance N2) prior to, and 2, 3 and 5 weeks post-C2HS.Inspiratory volume was diminished, and frequency enhanced, at 0.0 FICO2 (p<0.05) 2-weeks post-C2HS; further changes were not observed in the 3 and 5 week groups. Inspiratory frequency during hypercapnia was unaffected by C2HS. Hypercapnic inspiratory volumes were similarly attenuated at all time points post-C2HS (p<0.05), thereby decreasing hypercapnic minute ventilation (p<0.05). Thus, increases in ipsilateral phrenic activity during 4 weeks post-C2HS have little impact on the capacity to generate inspiratory volume in unanesthetized rats. Enhanced crossed phrenic activity post-C2HS may reflect plasticity associated in spinal axons not activated by our ventrolateral spinal stimulation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
F. J. Golder, L. Ranganathan, I. Satriotomo, M. Hoffman, M. R. Lovett-Barr, J. J. Watters, T. L. Baker-Herman, and G. S. Mitchell
Spinal Adenosine A2a Receptor Activation Elicits Long-Lasting Phrenic Motor Facilitation
J. Neurosci., February 27, 2008; 28(9): 2033 - 2042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.