Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (January 5, 2006). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00949.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/5/1527    most recent
00949.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borland, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vuylsteke, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Borland, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vuylsteke, A.
Submitted on August 3, 2005
Accepted on December 19, 2005

CAN A MEMBRANE OXYGENATOR BE A MODEL FOR LUNG NO AND CO TRANSFER?

Colin Borland1*, Helen Dunningham2, Fiona Bottrill3, and Alain Vuylsteke3

1 Department of Medicine, Hinchingbrooke Hospital, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
2 Cambridge Perfusion Services, Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
3 Department of Anaesthetic Research, Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: colin.borland{at}hinchingbrooke.nhs.uk.

To model lung nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO) uptake a membrane oxygenator circuit was primed with horse blood flowing at 2.5 L min-1. Its gas channel was ventilated with 5 ppm NO, 0.02% CO and 22% O2 at 5 L min-1. DNO and DCO were calculated from inlet and outlet gas concentrations and flow rates. DNO = 13.45 (SD = 5.84) ml.min-1 torr -1 and DCO = 1.22(SD = 0.3) ml.min-1 torr -1. DNO and DCO increased (P =.002) with blood volume/surface area. 1/ DNO (P <.001) and 1/ DCO (P <.001) increased with 1/Hb. DNO (P=.01)and DCO (P =.004)fell with increasing gas flow. DNO but not DCO increased with haemolysis (P =.001) indicating DNO dependence on red cell diffusive resistance. The post haemolysis value for Dm = 41 ml.min-1 torr -1 is the true membrane diffusing capacity of the system.No change in DNO or DCO occurred with changing blood flow rate. 1/DCO increased (P = .009) with increasing pO2. DNO and DCO appear diffusion limited and DCO reaction limited. In this apparatus the red cell and plasma offer a significant barrier to NO but not CO diffusion. Applying the Roughton-Forster model yields similar {theta}NO and {theta}CO to previous estimates. This approach allows alteration of membrane area/blood volume, blood flow, gas flow, oxygen tension, red cell integrity and haematocrit (over a larger range than encountered clinically) while keeping other variables constant . Though structurally very different, it offers a functional model of lung NO and CO transfer.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. N. Glenet, C. De Bisschop, F. Vargas, and H. J. P. Guenard
Deciphering the nitric oxide to carbon monoxide lung transfer ratio: physiological implications
J. Physiol., July 15, 2007; 582(2): 767 - 775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
H. Dunningham, C. Borland, F. Bottrill, A. Vuylsteke, and D. Gordon
Modelling lung and tissue diffusion using a membrane oxygenator circuit
Perfusion, July 1, 2007; 22(4): 231 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.