Journal of Applied Physiology Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 8, 2007). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00918.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/1/230    most recent
00918.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cagnie, B.
Right arrow Articles by Danneels, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cagnie, B.
Right arrow Articles by Danneels, L.
Submitted on August 28, 2007
Accepted on November 5, 2007

The use of functional MRI to evaluate cervical flexor activity during different cervical flexion exercises

Barbara Cagnie1*, Nele Dickx2, Ian Peeters1, Jan Tuytens1, Eric Achten3, Dirk Cambier1, and Lieven Danneels1

1 Rehabiliation sciences and physiotherapy, Ghent University, 9000, Belgium
2 Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
3 Department of Radiology, Ghent University, 9000, Belgium

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: barbara.cagnie{at}ugent.be.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the recruitment pattern of deep and superficial neck flexors evoked by three different cervical flexion exercises using muscle functional MRI. In 19 healthy participants, T2 values were calculated for the longus colli (Lco), longus capitis (Lca) and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) at rest and following three exercises: conventional cervical flexion (CF), craniocervical flexion (CCF) and a combined craniocervical flexion and cervical flexion (CCF-CF). CCF-CF gave the highest T2 increase for all muscles. CCF displayed a significantly higher T2 increase for the Lca compared to the Lco and the SCM. When comparing the CCF and CF, no significant difference was found for the Lca, whereas the Lco and SCM displayed a higher T2 increase during CF compared to CCF. This study shows that muscle functional MRI can be used to characterize the specific activation levels and recruitment patterns of the superficial and deep neck flexors during different cervical flexion exercises. During CCF-CF, all synergists are maximally recruited, which makes this exercise useful for high-load training. CCF may provide a more specific method to assess and retrain Lca muscle performance, compared to CF and CCF-CF. This study highlights the need to differentiate between the Lco and Lca when evaluating their function, since these results demonstrate a clear difference in activation of both muscles.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.