Journal of Applied Physiology AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (February 14, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00917.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/4/1094    most recent
00917.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verbanck, S.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verbanck, S.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, B. R.
Submitted on August 28, 2007
Accepted on February 13, 2008

The effect of conductive ventilation heterogeneity on diffusing capacity measurement

Sylvia Verbanck1*, Daniel Schuermans1, Sophie Van Malderen1, Walter Vincken1, and Bruce R. Thompson2

1 Respiratory Division, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
2 Respiratory Medicince, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sylvia.verbanck{at}uzbrussel.be.

It has long been assumed that the ventilation heterogeneity associated with lung disease could in itself affect the measurement of carbon monoxide transfer factor. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential estimation errors of carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLco) measurement that are specifically due to conductive ventilation heterogeneity,i.e.,due to a combination of ventilation heterogeneity and flow asynchrony between lung units larger than acini. We induced conductive airway ventilation heterogeneity in 35 never-smoker normal subjects by histamine provocation,and related the resulting changes in conductive ventilation heterogeneity (derived from the multiple breath washout test) to corresponding changes in diffusing capacity,alveolar volume and inspired vital capacity (derived from the single breath DLco method). Average conductive ventilation heterogeneity doubled (p<0.001),while DLco decreased by 6% (p<0.001),with no correlation between individual data (p>0.1). Average inspired vital capacity and alveolar volume both decreased significantly,by respectively 6% and 3%, and the individual changes in alveolar volume and in conductive ventilation heterogeneity were correlated (r=-0.46;p=0.006). These findings can be brought in agreement with recent modelling work, where specific ventilation heterogeneity resulting from different distributions of either inspired volume or end-expiratory lung volume have been shown to affect DLco estimation errors in opposite ways. Even in the presence of flow asynchrony,these errors appear to largely cancel out in our experimental situation of histamine-induced conductive ventilation heterogeneity. Finally,we also predicted which alternative combination of specific ventilation heterogeneity and flow asynchrony could affect DLco estimate in a more substantial fashion in diseased lungs,irrespective of any diffusion-dependent effects.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.