Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (August 4, 2005). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00891.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/6/2307    most recent
00891.2004v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, P.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, P.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, A.
Submitted on August 17, 2004
Accepted on July 18, 2005

Prolonged Electrical Muscle Stimulation Exercise Improves Strength and Aerobic Capacity in Healthy Sedentary Adults

Prithwish Banerjee1, Brian Caulfield2*, Louis Crowe3, and Andrew Clark1

1 Department of Academic Cardiology, University of Hull, Kingston-Upon-Hull, United Kingdom
2 School of Physiotherapy and Performance Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
3 BioMedical Research Ltd, Galway, Ireland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: b.caulfield{at}ucd.ie.

This investigation evaluated training responses to prolonged electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) in sedentary adults. Fifteen healthy subjects (10m, 5f) with a sedentary lifestyle completed a 6-week training programme during which they completed an average of 29 1-hour EMS sessions. The form of EMS used by the subjects was capable of eliciting a cardiovascular exercise response without loading the limbs or joints. It achieved this by means of inducing rapid, rhythmical contractions in the large leg muscles. A crossover study design was employed with subjects undergoing their habitual activity levels during the non-training phase of the study. The training effect was evaluated by means of a treadmill test to determine peak aerobic capacity, a 6-minute walking distance test, and measurement of body mass index and quadriceps muscle strength. At baseline the mean values for peak VO2, 6-minute walking distance, quadriceps strength and BMI were 2.46±0.57L/min, 493.3±36.8m, 360.8±108.7N, and 26.9±3.4kg/m2 respectively. Following training subjects demonstrated statistically significant improvements in all variables except BMI. Peak VO2 increased by an average of 0.24±0.16L/min (P<0.05), walking distance increased by 36.6±19.7 (P<0.005), quadriceps strength increased by 87.5±55.9N (P<0.005), whereas we did not observe a significant effect due to training on BMI (P>0.05). These results suggest that EMS can be used in sedentary adults to improve physical fitness. It may provide a viable alternative to more conventional forms of exercise in this population.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
A. Bogaerts, C. Delecluse, A. L. Claessens, W. Coudyzer, S. Boonen, and S. M. P. Verschueren
Impact of Whole-Body Vibration Training Versus Fitness Training on Muscle Strength and Muscle Mass in Older Men: A 1-Year Randomized Controlled Trial
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., June 1, 2007; 62(6): 630 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A. L Clark
Exercise and heart failure: assessment and treatment.
Heart, May 1, 2006; 92(5): 699 - 703.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.