Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 5, 2004). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00871.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/1050    most recent
00871.2004v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halliwill, J. R
Right arrow Articles by Minson, C. T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halliwill, J. R
Right arrow Articles by Minson, C. T
Submitted on August 12, 2004
Accepted on October 29, 2004

CARDIOVAGAL REGULATION DURING COMBINED HYPOXIC AND ORTHOSTATIC STRESS: FAINTERS VS NON-FAINTERS

John R Halliwill1* and Christopher T Minson1

1 Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: halliwil{at}uoregon.edu.

We tested the hypothesis that individual differences in the effect of acute hypoxia on the cardiovagal arterial baroreflex would determine individual susceptibility to hypoxic syncope. In 16 healthy, non-smoking, normotensive subjects (8 women, 8 men, 20 - 33 yrs), we assessed orthostatic tolerance with a 20-min 60 ° head upright tilt during both normoxia and hypoxia (breathing 12 % O2). On a separate occasion, we assessed baroreflex control of heart rate (cardiovagal baroreflex gain) using the modified Oxford technique during both normoxia and hypoxia. When subjects were tilted under hypoxic conditions, 5 of the 16 developed pre-syncopal signs or symptoms and the 20-min tilt had to be terminated. These "fainters" had comparable cardiovagal baroreflex gain to "non-fainters" under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions (normoxia, fainters: -1.2 ± 0.2, non-fainters: -1.0 ± 0.2 beats/min/mmHg, P = 0.252; hypoxia, fainters: -1.3 ± 0.2, non-fainters: -1.0 ± 0.1 beats/min/mmHg, all P = 0.208). Furthermore, hypoxia did not alter cardiovagal baroreflex gain in either group (both P > 0.8). It appears from these observations that hypoxic syncope results from the superimposed vasodilator effects of hypoxia on the cardiovascular system and not from a hypoxia-induced maladjustment in baroreflex control of heart rate.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.