Journal of Applied Physiology Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (December 21, 2006). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00865.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/4/1612    most recent
00865.2006v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lim, J.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, J. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lim, J.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, J. E
Submitted on August 6, 2006
Accepted on December 15, 2006

Optimal electrode placement for non-invasive electrical stimulation of human abdominal muscles

Julianne Lim1, Robert B Gorman1, Julian Peter Saboisky1, Simon Gandevia1*, and Jane E Butler2

1 Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
2 Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: s.gandevia.jap{at}unsw.edu.au.

Abdominal muscles are the most important expiratory muscles for coughing. Spinal cord injured patients have respiratory complications because of abdominal muscle weakness and paralysis and impaired ability to cough. We aimed to determine the optimal positioning of stimulating electrodes on the trunk for the non-invasive electrical activation of the abdominal muscles. In 6 healthy subjects, we compared twitch pressures produced by a single electrical pulse through surface electrodes placed either postero-laterally or anteriorly on the trunk to twitch pressures produced by magnetic stimulation of nerve roots at the T10 level. A gastro-esophageal catheter measured gastric pressure (Pga) and esophageal pressure (Pes). Twitches were recorded at increasing stimulus intensities at functional residual capacity (FRC) in the seated posture. The maximal intensity used was also delivered at total lung capacity (TLC). At FRC, twitch pressures were greatest with electrical stimulation postero-laterally and magnetic stimulation at T10 and smallest at the anterior site (Pga, 30±3 and 33±6 cmH2O vs. 12±3 cmH2O; Pes, 8±2 and 11±3 cmH2O vs. 5±1 cmH2O; mean±SE). At TLC twitch pressures were larger. The values for postero-lateral electrical stimulation were comparable to those evoked by thoracic magnetic stimulation. The postero-lateral stimulation site is the optimal site for generating gastric and esophageal twitch pressures with electrical stimulation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.