Journal of Applied Physiology Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (December 3, 2004). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00859.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/4/1334    most recent
00859.2004v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, C.
Submitted on August 9, 2004
Accepted on November 27, 2004

Reproducibility of the cold-induced vasodilation response in the human finger

Catherine O'Brien1*

1 Thermal and Mountain Medicine Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kate.obrien{at}us.army.mil.

Cold-induced vasodilation (CIVD) is a cyclic oscillation in blood flow that occurs in the extremities upon cold exposure, and that is likely associated with reduced risk of cold injury (e.g., frostbite) as well as improved manual dexterity and less pain while working in the cold. The CIVD response varies between individuals, but the within-subject reproducibility has not been adequately described. The purpose of this study was to quantify the within-subject variability in the CIVD response under standardized conditions. Twenty-one volunteers resting in a controlled environment (27°C) immersed the middle finger in warm water (42°C) for 15 min to standardize initial finger temperature, then in cold water (4°C; CWI) for 30 min, on five separate occasions. Skin temperature (Tf) and blood flow (laser Doppler; expressed as % change from warm water peak) responses that describe CIVD were identified, including initial nadir reached during CWI; onset time of CIVD; initial apex during CIVD; time of that apex; and overall mean during CWI. Within-subject coefficient of variation for Tf across the five tests for the nailbed and pad, respectively were: nadir, 9%, 21%; onset, 18%, 19%; apex, 12%, 17%; apex time, 23%, 24%; mean 10%, 15%. For blood flow these values were: nadir 52%, 64%; onset, 6%, 5%; apex, 33%, 31%; apex time 9%, 8%; and mean 43%, 34%. Greater variability was found in the temperature response of the finger pad than the nailbed, but for blood flow the variability was similar between locations. Variability in onset and apex time between sites was similar for both temperature and blood flow responses. The reproducibility of the timecourse of CIVD suggests this methodology may be of value for further studies examining the mechanism of the response.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
K.J.S. Anand MBBS DPhil
Analgesia for skin-breaking procedures in newborns and children: What works best?
Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 1, 2008; 179(1): 11 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.