Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol (October 6, 2005). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00767.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/2/390    most recent
00767.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Browning, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kram, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Browning, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kram, R.
Submitted on June 28, 2005
Accepted on September 29, 2005

Effects of Obesity and Sex on the Energetic Cost and Preferred Speed of Walking

Raymond C. Browning1*, Emily A. Baker1, Jessica A. Herron1, and Rodger Kram1

1 Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: raymond.browning{at}colorado.edu.

The metabolic energy cost of walking is determined, to a large degree, by body mass, but it is not clear how body composition and mass distribution influence this cost. We tested the hypothesis that walking would be most expensive for obese women compared to obese men and normal weight women and men. Further, we hypothesized that for all groups, preferred walking speed would correspond to the speed that minimized the gross energy cost per distance. We measured body composition, V O2max and preferred walking speed of 39 (19 class II obese, 20 normal weight) females and males. We also measured V O2 and V CO2 while the subjects walked on a level treadmill at six speeds (0.50 - 1.75 m/s). Both obesity and sex affected the net metabolic rate (W/kg) of walking. Net metabolic rates of obese subjects were only ~10% greater (per kg) than for normal weight subjects and net metabolic rates for females were ~10% greater than males. The increase in net metabolic rate at faster walking speeds was greatest in obese females compared to the other groups. Preferred walking speed was not different across groups (1.42 m/s) and was near the speed that minimized gross energy cost per distance. Surprisingly, mass distribution (thigh mass/body mass) was not related to net metabolic rate, but body composition (% fat) was (r2=0.43). Detailed biomechanical studies of walking are needed to investigate if obese individuals adopt novel energy saving mechanisms during walking.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
N. Peyrot, D. Thivel, L. Isacco, J.-B. Morin, P. Duche, and A. Belli
Do mechanical gait parameters explain the higher metabolic cost of walking in obese adolescents?
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2009; 106(6): 1763 - 1770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. C. Browning and R. Kram
Pound for pound: Working out how obesity influences the energetics of walking
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2009; 106(6): 1755 - 1756.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Rubenson, D. B. Heliams, S. K. Maloney, P. C. Withers, D. G. Lloyd, and P. A. Fournier
Reappraisal of the comparative cost of human locomotion using gait-specific allometric analyses
J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2007; 210(20): 3513 - 3524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Iriarte-Diaz, F. Bozinovic, and R. A. Vasquez
What explains the trot-gallop transition in small mammals?
J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2006; 209(20): 4061 - 4066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.