|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
2 Department of Physiology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taiwan - Republic of China
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: laifook{at}email.uky.edu.
The evaluation of airway resistance (Raw) in conscious mice requires both end-expiratory (Ve) and tidal volumes (Vt) (Ref. 22). In anesthetized BALB/c mice we measured lung area (AL) from ventral-to-dorsal x-ray images taken at FRC (Ve) and after air inflation with 0.25 and 0.50 ml (
VL). Total lung volume (VL) described by equation: VL =
VL + VFRC = KAL1.5 assumed uniform (isotropic) inflation. Total VFRC averaged 0.55 ml, consisting of 0.10 ml tissue, 0.21 ml blood and 0.24 ml air. K averaged 1.84. In conscious mice in a sealed box, we measured the peak-to-peak box pressure excursions (
Pb) and x-rays during several cycles. K was used to convert measured AL1.5 to VL values. We calculated Ve and Vt from the plot of VL vs. cos (
-
). Phase angle
was the minimum point of the Pb cycle to x-ray exposure.
, phase difference between the Pb and VL cycles, was measured from
Pb values using room and body temperature humidified box air. A similar analysis was used after aerosol exposures to bronchoconstrictor methacholine (Mch), except that
depended also on increased Raw. In conscious mice, Ve doubled after Mch (50-125 mg/ml) exposure with constant Vt, frequency (f),
Pb and Raw. In anesthetized mice, in addition to an increased Ve, repeated 100 mg/ml Mch exposures increased
Pb and Raw and decreased f to apnea in 10 minutes. Thus conscious mice adapted to Mch by limiting Raw, while anesthesia resulted in airway closure followed by diaphragm fatigue and failure.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Agrawal, S. K. Singh, V. P. Singh, E. Murphy, and I. Parikh Partitioning of nasal and pulmonary resistance changes during noninvasive plethysmography in mice J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2008; 105(6): 1975 - 1979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Mitzner Why can't mice just learn to pant? J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2008; 105(2): 402 - 402. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |