Journal of Applied Physiology Virginia Commonwealth University
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (April 11, 2003). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00718.2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/2/497    most recent
00718.2002v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, W. D
Right arrow Articles by Jarabek, A. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, W. D
Right arrow Articles by Jarabek, A. M
Submitted on August 5, 2002
Accepted on April 7, 2003

NASAL CONTRIBUTION TO BREATHING WITH EXERCISE: EFFECT OF RACE AND GENDER

William D Bennett1*, Kirby L Zeman1, and Annie M Jarabek2

1 Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma and Lung Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
2 National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: William_Bennett{at}med.unc.edu.

Because the nose acts as a filter to prevent penetration of toxic particles and gases to the lower respiratory tract, the route of breathing, oral vs. nasal, - may be an important determinant of toxicant dose to the lungs. Using respiratory inductance plethysmography and a nasal mask fitted with flow meter, we measured the nasal contribution to breathing at rest and during exercise (to 60% max workload) in healthy young adults (Male/Female = 11/11 and Caucasian/African-American = 11/11). We found that the nasal contribution to breathing is less during submaximal exercise in the Caucasians vs. African-Americans (e.g. at 60% max workload, mean nasal/total ventilation = 0.40 +/- 0.21 and 0.65 +/- 0.24 respectively, P < 0.05). This difference is likely due to the African-Americans ability to achieve higher maximal inspiratory flows through their nose than the Caucasians. Males also had a lesser nasal contribution to breathing during exercise as compared to females. This is likely due to greater minute ventilations at any given %max workload in males vs. females.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.