Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (January 10, 2003). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00718.2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/5/1955    most recent
00718.2001v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sandercock, T. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sandercock, T. G
Submitted on July 10, 2001
Accepted on December 23, 2002

Nonlinear Summation Of Force In Cat Tibialis Anterior: A Muscle With Intrafascicularly Terminating Fibers

Thomas G Sandercock1*

1 Depatment of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: t-sandercock{at}northwestern.edu.

The complex connective tissue structure of muscle and tendon suggests that forces from two parts of a muscle may not summate linearly, particularly in muscles with intrafasciculary terminating fibers, such as cat tibialis anterior (TA) . In 4 anaesthetized cats the TA was attached to a servomechanism to control muscle length and record force. The ventral roots were divided into two bundles, each innervating about half the TA, so the two parts could be stimulated alone or together. Nonlinear summation (Fnl) was measured during isometric contractions. Fnl was small and negative, indicating less than linear summation of the parts, which is consistent with the predicted Fnl of muscle fibers connected in series. Fnl was more significant when smaller parts of the muscle were tested (21.8% versus 8% for whole muscle). These data were fit to a model where both parts of the muscle were assumed to stretch a common-elasticity. Compensatory movements of the servomechanism showed the common-elasticity is very stiff and the model cannot account for Fnl in cat TA.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.