Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (August 3, 2006). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00717.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/6/1607    most recent
00717.2006v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeGroot, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kenney, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeGroot, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kenney, W. L.
Submitted on June 26, 2006
Accepted on July 26, 2006

Responses to mild cold stress are predicted by different individual characteristics in young and older subjects

David W. DeGroot1*, George Havenith2, and W. Larry Kenney3

1 Physiology, Pennsylvania State University, Univeristy Park, Pennsylvania, United States
2 Human Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
3 Noll Physiology Research Center, Physiology and Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dwd141{at}psu.edu.

Older individuals’ ability to maintain core temperature during cold stress is impaired; however, the relative importance of individual characteristics that influence this response are unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative influence of individual characteristics on Tc and tissue insulation (It) during mild cold stress. Forty-two young (23±1 years, range 18-30) and 46 older (71±1 years, range 65-89) subjects, varying widely in muscularity, adiposity, and body size, underwent a transient cooling protocol during which esophageal temperature (Tes) was measured continuously and It was calculated using standard equations. Multiple regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of Tes and It and standardized regression coefficients were analyzed to determine the relative influence of each predictor. Candidate predictors included age, sex, weight, body surface area, body surface area to mass ratio, sum of skinfolds, %fat, appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASMM), and thyroid hormone concentrations ([T3], [T4]). The sum of skinfolds explained 67% (p<0.01) of the Tes variance in young subjects vs. 2% (p=0.30) in older subjects. Conversely, ASMM explained a greater portion of the variance in older subjects for both Tes (older: 28%, p<0.01; young: 8%, n.s.) and It (older: 46%, p<0.01; young: 17%, p<0.01). The Tes residual variance was considerably larger in older subjects (59-72% vs. 14-42% in young subjects), possibly due to varying rates of physiological aging. These results suggest that the relative influence of individual characteristics change with aging.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.