Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (September 20, 2007). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00698.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/5/1696    most recent
00698.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bates, J. H.T.
Right arrow Articles by Lundblad, L. K.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bates, J. H.T.
Right arrow Articles by Lundblad, L. K.A.
Submitted on June 29, 2007
Accepted on August 30, 2007

BRONCHODILATORY EFFECT OF DEEP INSPIRATION ON THE DYNAMICS OF BRONCHOCONSTRICTION IN MICE

Jason H.T. Bates1*, Ana Cojocaru1, and Lennart K.A. Lundblad1

1 Vermont Lung Center, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jason.h.bates{at}uvm.edu.

We recently developed a computational model of an airway embedded in elastic parenchyma (J Appl Physiol 102: 1912-1920, 2007) that accurately mimics the time dependence of airway resistance on tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) following methacholine injection in normal animals. In the present study, we compared the model predictions of bronchodilation induced by a deep inflation (DI) of the lung following administration of the bronchial agonist methacholine to corresponding experimental measurements made in mice. We found that a DI in mice caused an immediate reduction in airway resistance when it was administered soon after intravenous injection of methacholine, while the airway smooth muscle was in the process of contracting. However, the magnitude of the reduction in resistance was greater and its subsequent rate of increase less than that predicted by the model. We found that this effect was most pronounced when the DI was given within about 3 seconds following methacholine injection, again in contrast to the predictions of the model. The reduction of airway resistance was virtually independent of the rate of lung inflation during the DI, however, which agrees with model predictions. We conclude that while the model accounts for a substantial fraction of the post-DI reduction in airway resistance seen experimentally, there remain important differences between prediction and experiment which suggest that the effects of a DI are not simply due to eccentric contraction of the airway smooth muscle.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. Cojocaru, C. G. Irvin, H. C. Haverkamp, and J. H. T. Bates
Computational assessment of airway wall stiffness in vivo in allergically inflamed mouse models of asthma
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2008; 104(6): 1601 - 1610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.