Journal of Applied Physiology Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (October 20, 2005). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00689.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/2/384    most recent
00689.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aljuri, N.
Right arrow Articles by Freitag, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aljuri, N.
Right arrow Articles by Freitag, L.
Submitted on June 13, 2005
Accepted on October 19, 2005

The viscoelasticity of the trachea and its effects on flow limitation

Nikolai Aljuri1*, Jose G. Venegas2, and Lutz Freitag3

1 Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Anaesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
2 Department of Anaesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
3 Institute for Experimental Pneumology, Lungenklinik Hemer, Hemer, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nikko{at}mit.edu.

To test the hypothesis that peek expiratory flow is determined by the wave-speed limiting mechanism, we studied the time dependency of the trachea and its effects on flow limitation. For this purpose, we assessed the relationship between transmural pressure and cross-sectional area (the tube law, TL) of six excised human tracheae under controlled conditions of static (no-flow) and forced expiratory flow. We found that tube laws of isolated human tracheae followed quite well the mathematical representation proposed by Shapiro et all (11) for elastic tubes. Furthermore, we found that the TL measured at the onset of forced expiratory flow (DTL) was significantly stiffer than the static TL (STL). As a result, the stiffer DTL predicted theoretical maximal expiratory flows far greater than those predicted by the more compliant STL, which in all cases studied failed to explain peak expiratory flows measured at the onset of forced expiration. We conclude that the observed viscoelasticity of the tracheal walls can account for the measured differences between maximal and "supra-maximal" expiratory flows seen at the onset of forced expiration.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.