Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (September 23, 2003). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00686.2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/1/161    most recent
00686.2002v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartok, C.
Right arrow Articles by Schoeller, D. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bartok, C.
Right arrow Articles by Schoeller, D. A
Submitted on July 26, 2002
Accepted on September 14, 2003

Estimation of Segmental Muscle Volume by Bioelectrical Impedance Spectroscopy

Cynthia Bartok1 and Dale A Schoeller1*

1 Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dschoell{at}nutrisci.wisc.edu.

This study validated bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) with Cole-Cole modeled measurements of calf and arm segmental water volume and volume changes during 72 hours of simulated microgravity and caloric restriction using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) muscle volume as a criterion method. MRI and BIS measurements of calf and upper arm segments were made in 18 healthy males and females (mean±SD, age: 29±8 y, height: 171±11 cm, mass: 71±16 kg) before and after the intervention. Muscle volume of arm and leg segments by MRI was on average 15±10% and 14±8% lower (respectively) than the estimated total water volume by BIS (P<0.01), but their correlations were excellent (r=0.96 and r=0.93, respectively). MRI vs. BIS predicted volume changes were 49±68 cc vs. 41±62 cc decrease in the calf and 18±23 cc vs. 11±24 cc decrease in the arm, respectively (P>0.05 for both). BIS detected the extracellular water shifts in the calf resulting from the head down tilt treatment, but the underfeeding protocol was not of sufficient duration or intensity to produce limb intracellular water changes detectable by BIS. BIS was highly correlated with segmental muscle volume and tracked changes associated with head down tilt. Further research, however, is needed to determine if BIS can accurately access separate changes in intracellular and extracellular volume.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
N. I. Tanaka, M. Miyatani, Y. Masuo, T. Fukunaga, and H. Kanehisa
Applicability of a segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis for predicting the whole body skeletal muscle volume
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2007; 103(5): 1688 - 1695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. Stahn, E. Terblanche, and G. Strobel
Modeling upper and lower limb muscle volume by bioelectrical impedance analysis
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2007; 103(4): 1428 - 1435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
N. Ishiguro, H. Kanehisa, M. Miyatani, Y. Masuo, and T. Fukunaga
Applicability of segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis for predicting trunk skeletal muscle volume
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2006; 100(2): 572 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.