Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (August 22, 2003). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00667.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/6/2299    most recent
00667.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zimatore, G.
Right arrow Articles by Colosimo, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zimatore, G.
Right arrow Articles by Colosimo, A.
Submitted on June 30, 2003
Accepted on August 16, 2003

Otoacoustic emissions at different click intensities: invariant and subject dependent features

Giovanna Zimatore1, Alessandro Giuliani2, Stavros Hatzopoulos3, Alessandro Martini3, and Alfredo Colosimo1*

1 Department of Human Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
2 T.C.E. Laboratory, Istituto Superiore di Sanita', Rome, Italy
3 Audiology Department and Center of Bioacoustics, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a.colosimo{at}caspur.it.

A study of Click Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (CEOAEs) elicited at stimulation intensities from 35 to over 80 dB was carried out by Recurrence Quantification Analysis (RQA) on signals from both normal and hearing impaired subjects. In normal subjects, a clear scaling of determinism with increasing stimulation intensity was observed in the click intensity range from 41 to 59 dB. Outside that range and, in particular, above its upper end, subject-dependent features appeared in the form of different maximal levels of determinism. A comparative analysis of responses from hearing impaired subjects with conductive hearing losses and sensorineural hearing losses suggested that the principal contributor to this behavior is the middle ear and allowed to discriminate the two pathologies solely on the basis of CEOAEs. These observations are consistent with a simple phenomenological model of the auditory periphery in which different functional modules are sequentially recruited at increasing stimulus intensities, with a consequent rise in CEOAEs coherence.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.