Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (April 14, 2005). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00652.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/3/937    most recent
00652.2004v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoo, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Durand, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoo, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Durand, D. M.
Submitted on June 24, 2004
Accepted on April 12, 2005

The Effects of Selective Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation on Canine Upper Airway Mechanics

Paul B. Yoo1* and Dominique M. Durand1

1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: paul.yoo{at}duke.edu.

Electrical stimulation of the hypoglossal (XII) nerve has been demonstrated as an effective approach to treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) The physiological effects of conventional modes of stimulation (i.e., genioglossus activation or whole XII nerve stimulation), however, have yielded inconsistent and only partial alleviations of hypopneic or apneic events. While selective stimulation of the multi-fasciculated XII nerve offers many stimulus options, it is not clear how these will functionally affect the upper airway (UAW). To study these effects, animal experiments in eight beagles were performed to investigate changes in the UAW resistance (RUAW) and critical pressure (Pcrit), during simulated expiration (n = 4) and inspiration (n = 4). During expiration, non-selective XII nerve stimulation yielded the greatest improvement in RUAW (-0.66 ± 0.11 cmH2O/L/min), compared to that for selective activation of the geniohyoid (GH; -0.29 ± 0.09 cmH2O/L/min), genioglossus (GG; -0.31 ± 0.12 cmH2O/L/min) and hyoglossus/styloglossus (HG/SG: 0.37 ± 0.06 cmH2O/L/min) muscles. For simulated inspiration, on the other hand, only whole XII nerve stimulation (-0.9 ± 0.4 cmH2O) and co-activation of the GG + HG/SG muscles (-1.18 ± 0.6 cmH2O) produced significant (p < 0.05) improvements in UAW stability (i.e., lowered Pcrit), compared to baseline (-0.52 ± 0.32 cmH2O). The results of this study suggest that a multi-contact nerve electrode can be used to achieve both UAW dilation and patency, comparable to that obtained with non-selective stimulation, by selectively activating the various branches of the XII nerve.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. Oliven, M. Odeh, L. Geitini, R. Oliven, U. Steinfeld, A. R. Schwartz, and N. Tov
Effect of coactivation of tongue protrusor and retractor muscles on pharyngeal lumen and airflow in sleep apnea patients
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2007; 103(5): 1662 - 1668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
E. F. Bailey, Y.-H. Huang, and R. F. Fregosi
Anatomic consequences of intrinsic tongue muscle activation
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2006; 101(5): 1377 - 1385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.