Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (March 15, 2007). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00583.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/6/2266    most recent
00583.2006v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ortega, J. D
Right arrow Articles by Farley, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ortega, J. D
Right arrow Articles by Farley, C. T.
Submitted on May 24, 2006
Accepted on February 28, 2007

Individual limb work does not explain the greater metabolic cost of walking in elderly adults

Justus D Ortega1* and Claire T. Farley1

1 Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ortegajd{at}colorado.edu.

Elderly adults consume more metabolic energy during walking than young adults. Our study tested the hypothesis that elderly adults consume more metabolic energy during walking than young adults because they perform more individual limb work on the center of mass. Thus, we compared how much individual limb work young and elderly adults performed on the center of mass during walking. We measured metabolic rate and ground reaction force while ten elderly and ten young subjects walked at five speeds between 0.7 and 1.8 m s-1. Compared to young subjects, elderly subjects consumed an average of 20% more metabolic energy (p = 0.010) whereas they performed an average of 10% less individual limb work during walking over the range of speeds (p = 0.028). During the single support phase, elderly and young subjects both conserved approximately 80% of the center of mass mechanical energy by inverted pendulum energy exchange and performed a similar amount of individual limb work (p = 0.473). However, during double support, elderly subjects performed an average of 17% less individual limb work than young subjects (p = 0.007) because their forward speed fluctuated less (p = 0.006). We conclude that the greater metabolic cost of walking in elderly adults cannot be explained by a difference in individual limb work. Future studies should examine whether a greater metabolic cost of stabilization, reduced muscle efficiency, greater antagonist co-contraction, and/or a greater cost of generating muscle force cause the elevated metabolic cost of walking in elderly adults.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
D. S. Reisman, K. S. Rudolph, and W. B. Farquhar
Influence of Speed on Walking Economy Poststroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2009; 23(6): 529 - 534.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.