Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 10, 2005). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00579.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/3/1043    most recent
00579.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, C. A.
Submitted on May 17, 2005
Accepted on October 27, 2005

Determinants of skin sympathetic nerve responses to isometric exercise

Thad E. Wilson1*, Damian J. Dyckman1, and Chester A. Ray2

1 Department of Medicine (Division of Cardiology), Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, 17033, USA
2 Department of Medicine (Division of Cardiology), Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, 17033, USA; Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, 17033, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: thad.e.wilson{at}drexel.edu.

Exercise-induced increases in skin sympathetic nerve activity (SSNA) are similar between isometric handgrip (IHG) and leg extension (IKE) performed at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). However, it is unclear is the precise effect of exercise intensity and level of fatigue on this relationship. This study tested the following hypotheses: 1) exercise intensity and fatigue level would not affect the magnitude of exercise-induced increase in SSNA between IHG and IKE, and 2) altering IHG muscle mass would also not affect the magnitude of exercise-induced increase in SSNA. Protocol 1: SSNA (peroneal microneurography) was measured during baseline, and during the initial and last 30 sec of isometric exercise to volitional fatigue in 12 subjects who randomly performed IHG and IKE bouts at 15, 30, and 45% MVC. Protocol 2: SSNA was measured in 8 subjects who performed 1-arm IHG at 30% MVC with the addition of IHG of the contralateral arm in 10 sec intervals for 1 min. Exercise intensity significantly increased SSNA responses during the first 30 sec of IHG (34±13, 70±11, and 92±13% change from baseline) and IKE (30±17, 69±12, and 76±13% change from baseline) for 15, 30, and 45% MVC. During the last 30 sec of exercise to volitional fatigue, there were no significant differences in SSNA between exercise intensities or limb. SSNA did not significantly change between 1-arm to 2-arm IHG. Combined, these data indicate that exercise-induced increases in SSNA are intensity dependent in the initial portion of isometric exercise but these differences are eliminated with the development of fatigue. Moreover, the magnitude of exercise-induced increase in SSNA responses is dependent neither on muscle mass involved nor exercising limb.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.