Journal of Applied Physiology Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 9, 2006). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00564.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/3/1000    most recent
00564.2006v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudroff, T.
Right arrow Articles by Enoka, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rudroff, T.
Right arrow Articles by Enoka, R. M.
Submitted on May 18, 2006
Accepted on October 31, 2006

ACCESSORY MUSCLE ACTIVITY CONTRIBUTES TO THE VARIATION IN TIME TO TASK FAILURE FOR DIFFERENT ARM POSTURES AND LOADS

Thorsten Rudroff1*, Benjamin K Barry1, Amy L Stone1, Carolyn J Barry1, and Roger M. Enoka1

1 Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: thorsten.rudroff{at}colorado.edu.

Time to failure and EMG activity were measured during two types of sustained submaximal contractions with the elbow flexors that required each subject to exert the same net muscle torque with the forearm in two different postures. Twenty men performed the tasks either by maintaining a constant force while pushing against a force transducer (force task) or by supporting an equivalent load while maintaining a constant elbow angle (position task). The time to failure for the position task with the elbow flexed at 1.57 rad and the forearm horizontal was less than that for the force task (5.2 ± 2.6 and 8.8 ± 3.6 min, P = 0.003), whereas it was similar when the forearm was vertical (7.9 ± 4.1 and 7.8 ± 4.5 min, P = 0.995). The activity of the rotator cuff muscles was greater during the position tasks (25.1 ± 10.1 % MVC) compared with the force tasks (15.2 ± 5.4 % MVC, P < 0.001) in both forearm postures. However, the rates of increase in EMG of the accessory muscles and mean arterial pressure were greater for the position task only when the forearm was horizontal (P < 0.05), whereas it was similar for the elbow flexors. These findings indicate that forearm posture influences the difference in the time to failure for the two fatiguing contractions. When there was a difference between the two tasks, the task with the briefer time to failure involved greater rates of increase in accessory muscle activity and mean arterial pressure.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Baudry, T. Rudroff, L. A. Pierpoint, and R. M. Enoka
Load Type Influences Motor Unit Recruitment in Biceps Brachii During a Sustained Contraction
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1725 - 1735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Z. A. Riley, S. Baudry, and R. M. Enoka
Reflex Inhibition in Human Biceps Brachii Decreases With Practice of a Fatiguing Contraction
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2843 - 2851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. K. Hunter, T. Yoon, J. Farinella, E. E. Griffith, and A. V. Ng
Time to task failure and muscle activation vary with load type for a submaximal fatiguing contraction with the lower leg
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2008; 105(2): 463 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. Rudroff, D. Staudenmann, and R. M. Enoka
Electromyographic measures of muscle activation and changes in muscle architecture of human elbow flexors during fatiguing contractions
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2008; 104(6): 1720 - 1726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Klass, M. Levenez, R. M. Enoka, and J. Duchateau
Spinal Mechanisms Contribute to Differences in the Time to Failure of Submaximal Fatiguing Contractions Performed With Different Loads
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1096 - 1104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
R. M. Enoka and J. Duchateau
Muscle fatigue: what, why and how it influences muscle function
J. Physiol., January 1, 2008; 586(1): 11 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
B. K. Barry and R. M. Enoka
The neurobiology of muscle fatigue: 15 years later
Integr. Comp. Biol., October 1, 2007; 47(4): 465 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. G. Semmler, K. J. Tucker, T. J. Allen, and U. Proske
Eccentric exercise increases EMG amplitude and force fluctuations during submaximal contractions of elbow flexor muscles
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2007; 103(3): 979 - 989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.