Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (September 6, 2007). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00561.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/6/1929    most recent
00561.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Younes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hanly, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Younes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hanly, P.
Submitted on May 23, 2007
Accepted on September 5, 2007

MECHANISMS OF BREATHING INSTABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA

Magdy Younes1*, Michele Ostrowski2, Raj Atkar2, John Laprairie2, AnDrea Siemens2, and Patrick Hanly2

1 Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
2 Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mkyounes{at}shaw.ca.

The response to chemical stimuli (chemical responsiveness), and the increases in respiratory drive required for arousal (arousal threshold) and for opening the airway without arousal (effective recruitment threshold) are important determinants of ventilatory instability and, hence, severity of obstructive apnea. We measured these variables in 21 obstructive apnea patients (apnea-hypopnea-index 91±24hr-1) while on continuous-positive-airway-pressure. During sleep, pressure was intermittently reduced (dial-down) to induce severe hypopneas. Dial-downs were done on room air and following {approx}30seconds of breathing hypercapneic and/or hypoxic mixtures, which induced a range of ventilatory stimulation prior to dial-down. Ventilation just before dial-down and flow during dial-down were measured. Chemical responsiveness, estimated as the % increase in ventilation during the 5th breath following administration of 6%CO2 combined with {approx}4% desaturation, was large (187±117%). Arousal threshold, estimated as the % increase in ventilation associated with a 50% probability of arousal, ranged from 40% to >268% and was <120% in 12/21 patients, indicating that in many patients arousal occurs with modest changes in chemical drive. Effective recruitment threshold, estimated as % increase in pre-dial-down ventilation associated with a significant increase in dial-down flow, ranged from zero to >174% and was <110% in 12/21 patients, indicating that in many patients reflex dilatation occurs with modest increases in drive. The two thresholds were not correlated. Conclusions: In most OSA patients, airway patency may be maintained with only modest increases in chemical drive but instability results because of a low arousal threshold and a brisk increase in drive following brief reduction in alveolar ventilation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PhysiologyHome page
Highlights From The Literature
Physiology, April 1, 2008; 23(2): 61 - 63.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.