Journal of Applied Physiology  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (August 3, 2006). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00544.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/5/1506    most recent
00544.2006v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carson, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carson, R. G.
Submitted on May 15, 2006
Accepted on July 20, 2006

Changes in Muscle Coordination with Training

Richard G. Carson1*

1 School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, N. Ireland, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: r.g.carson{at}qub.ac.uk.

Three core concepts: activity dependent coupling, the composition of muscle synergies, and Hebbian adaptation, are discussed with a view to illustrating the nature of the constraints imposed by the organisation of the CNS upon the changes in muscle coordination induced by training. It is argued that training invoked variations in the efficiency with which motor actions can be generated, influence the stability of coordination by altering the potential for activity dependent coupling between the cortical representations of the focal muscles recruited in a movement task and brain circuits that do not contribute directly to the required behaviour. The behaviours that can be generated during training are also constrained by the composition of existing intrinsic muscle synergies. In circumstances in which attempts to produce forceful or high velocity movements would otherwise result in the generation of inappropriate actions, training designed to promote the development of control strategies specific to the desired movement outcome may be necessary to compensate for protogenic muscle recruitment patterns. Hebbian adaptation refers to processes whereby, for neurons that release action potentials at the same time, there is an increased probability that synaptic connections will be formed. Neural connectivity induced by the repetition of specific muscle recruitment patterns during training may however inhibit the subsequent acquisition of new skills. Consideration is given to the possibility that, in the presence of the appropriate sensory guidance, it is possible to gate Hebbian plasticity, and promote greater subsequent flexibility in the recruitment of the trained muscles in other task contexts.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.