Journal of Applied Physiology Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (February 13, 2004). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00540.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/6/2109    most recent
00540.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Straszek, S. P
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, O. F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Straszek, S. P
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, O. F
Submitted on May 20, 2003
Accepted on February 10, 2004

Nasal Cavity Dimensions in Guinea Pig and Rat measured by Acoustic Rhinometry and Fluid-Displacement-Method

Sune P Straszek1* and Ole F Pedersen1

1 Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: spvs{at}mil.au.dk.

The purpose of the study was to measure nasal passageway dimensions in guinea pigs and rats by use of acoustic rhinometry (AR) and by a previously described fluid-displacement-method (FDM) (J Appl Physiol. 95:635-642, 2003) to investigate the potential of AR in pharmacological research with these animals. We measured the area-distance relationships by AR of nasal cavities post mortem in 5 guinea pigs (Duncan Hartley, 400 g) and 5 rats (Wistar, 250 g) using custom made equipment scaled for the purpose. Nosepieces were made from plastic pipette tips and either inserted into or glued onto the nostrils. We used liquid perfluorocarbon in the fluid-displacement study, and it was carried out subsequent to the acoustic measurements. We found for guinea pigs that AR measured a mean volume of 98 mm3 (95-100) (mean and 95% confidence interval) of the first 2 cm of the cavity. FDM measured a mean volume of 146 mm3 (117-175), meaning AR only measured 70% (50-90) of the volume by FDM. For rats the volume from 0 to 2 cm was 58 mm3 (55-61) by AR and 73 mm3 (60-87) by FDM, resulting in AR only measuring 83% (66-100) of volume by FDM (table 2). We conclude that absolute nasal cavity dimensions are underestimated by AR in guinea pigs and rats. This does not preclude that relative changes may be correctly measured. In vivo trials with AR using rats have not yet been published. The fluid-displacement-method is possibly the most accurate alternative to acoustic rhinometry for measurements of the nasal cavity geometry in small laboratory animals, but can only be used post mortem.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
S. M. Tarlo, J.-L. Malo, and on behalf of the Third Jack Pepys Workshop on Asth
An Official ATS Proceedings: Asthma in the Workplace: The Third Jack Pepys Workshop on Asthma in the Workplace: Answered and Unanswered Questions
Proceedings of the ATS, August 1, 2009; 6(4): 339 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.