Journal of Applied Physiology Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (June 30, 2005). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00532.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/5/1704    most recent
00532.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, R.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, L.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, R.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, L.-Y.
Submitted on May 6, 2005
Accepted on June 21, 2005

Stimulatory effect of CO2 on vagal bronchopulmonary C-fiber afferents during airway inflammation

Ruei-Lung Lin1, Qihai Gu1, You-Shuei Lin1, and Lu-Yuan Lee1*

1 Physiology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lylee{at}uky.edu.

This study investigated: 1) whether pulmonary C-fibers are activated by a transient increase in the CO2 concentration of alveolar gas; 2) if the CO2 sensitivity of these afferents is altered during airway inflammation. Single-unit pulmonary C-fiber activity was recorded in anesthetized, open-chest rats. Transient alveolar hypercapnia (HPC) was induced by administering a CO2-enriched gas mixture (25-30% CO2, 21% O2, balance N2) for 5-8 breaths, which increased alveolar CO2 concentration progressively to near or above 13% for 3-5 s and lowered the arterial pH transiently to 7.10 ± 0.05. Our results showed: 1) HPC evoked only a mild stimulation in a small fraction (4/47) of pulmonary C-fibers, and there was no significant change in fiber activity ({Delta}FA = 0.22 ± 0.16 impulses/s; P > 0.1, n = 47); 2) in sharp contrast, after airway exposure to poly-L-lysine (PLL), a cationic protein known to induce mucosal injury, the same challenge of transient HPC activated 87.5% of the pulmonary C-fibers tested and evoked a distinct stimulatory effect on these afferents ({Delta}FA = 6.59 ± 1.78 impulses/s; P < 0.01, n = 8); 3) similar potentiation of the C-fiber response to HPC was also observed after acute exposure to ozone (n = 6), and during a constant infusion of inflammatory mediators such as adenosine (n = 15) or prostaglandin E2 (n = 12); and 4) The enhanced C-fiber sensitivity to CO2 after PLL was completely abrogated by infusion of NaHCO3 (1.82 mmol/kg/min) that prevented the reduction in pH during HPC (n = 6). In conclusion, only a small percentage (< 10%) of the bronchopulmonary C-fibers exhibit CO2 sensitivity under control condition, but alveolar HPC exerts a consistent and pronounced stimulatory effect on the C-fiber endings during airway inflammation. This effect of CO2 is probably mediated through the action of hydrogen ions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. Wang and F. Xu
Postnatal development of right atrial injection of capsaicin-induced apneic response in rats
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2006; 101(1): 60 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.