Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (October 8, 2004). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00532.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/2/437    most recent
00532.2004v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, P. J.
Submitted on May 20, 2004
Accepted on October 6, 2004

The Impact of Changes in Inspired Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide on Respiratory Instability in the Lamb

Malcolm H. Wilkinson1*, Kah-Ling Sia1, Elizabeth M. Skuza1, Vojta Brodecky1, and Philip J. Berger1

1 Ritchie Centre for Baby Health Research, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mal.wilkinson{at}med.monash.edu.au.

We examined the effect of hypoxia and hypercapnia administered during deliberately induced periodic breathing (PB) in 7 lambs following post-hyperventilation apnea. Based on our theoretical analysis the sensitivity or loop gain (LG) of the respiratory control system of the lamb is directly proportional to the difference between alveolar PO2 and inspired PO2. This analysis indicates that during PB, when by necessity LG is > 1, replacement of the inspired gas with one of reduced PO2 lowers LG; if we made PIO2 approximate alveolar PO2, we predict LG would be approximately zero, and breathing would promptly stabilize. In 6 lambs we switched the inspired gas from FIO2 = 0.4 to FIO2 = 0.12 during an epoch of PB; PB was immediately suppressed supporting the view that the peripheral chemoreceptors play a pivotal role in the genesis and control of unstable breathing in the lamb. In the 6 lambs in which we administered hypercapnic gas during PB, breathing instability was also suppressed, but only after a considerable time lag, indicating the CO2 effect is likely to have been mediated through the central chemoreceptors. When we simulated both interventions in a published model of the adult respiratory controller, PB was immediately suppressed by CO2 inhalation and exacerbated by inhalation of hypoxic gas. These fundamentally different responses in lamb and adult human demonstrate that PB has differing underlying mechanisms in the two species.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.