Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (August 1, 2003). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00525.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/5/2106    most recent
00525.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Usmani, O. S
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, P. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Usmani, O. S
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, P. J
Submitted on May 16, 2003
Accepted on July 30, 2003

The effects of bronchodilator particle size in asthmatics using monodisperse aerosols

Omar S Usmani1*, Martyn F Biddiscombe2, Julia A Nightingale1, S. Richard Underwood2, and Peter J Barnes1

1 Department of Thoracic Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: o.usmani{at}imperial.ac.uk.

Aerosol particle size influences airway drug deposition. Current inhaler devices are inefficient, delivering a heterodisperse distribution of drug particle sizes where at best, 20% reaches the lungs. Monodisperse aerosols are the appropriate research tools to investigate basic aerosol science concepts within the human airways. We hypothesized that engineering such aerosols of albuterol would identify the ideal bronchodilator particle size, thereby optimizing inhaled therapeutic drug delivery. Eighteen stable mild-moderate asthmatics (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 74.3% predicted) participated in a randomised, double blind, cross-over study design. We used a spinning top aerosol generator to produce monodisperse albuterol aerosols of size 1.5µm, 3µm, 6µm, and placebo, which were inhaled at cumulative doses of 10, 20, 40 and 100µg. Lung function changes and tolerability effects were determined. The larger particles, 6µm & 3µm, were significantly more potent bronchodilators than 1.5µm and placebo aerosols for FEV1, and forced expiratory flow 25-75% of forced vital capacity. A 20µg dose of the 6µm and 3µm aerosols achieved comparable FEV1 bronchodilation to 200µg from a metered dose inhaler. No adverse effects were observed in heart rate and plasma potassium The data suggest that in mild-moderate asthmatics there is more than one optimal {beta}2-agonist bronchodilator particle size, and that these are larger particles in the higher part of the respirable range. Aerosols delivered in monodisperse form can enable large reductions of the inhaled dose without loss of clinical efficacy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
G. Horvath, N. Schmid, M. A. Fragoso, A. Schmid, G. E. Conner, M. Salathe, and A. Wanner
Epithelial Organic Cation Transporters Ensure pH-Dependent Drug Absorption in the Airway
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., January 1, 2007; 36(1): 53 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
O. S. Usmani, M. F. Biddiscombe, and P. J. Barnes
Regional Lung Deposition and Bronchodilator Response as a Function of {beta}2-Agonist Particle Size
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 15, 2005; 172(12): 1497 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. W. Ind
Bigger May Be Better: Targeted {beta}2-Agonist Therapy
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2005; 172(6): 656 - 657.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.