Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (December 8, 2005). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00512.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/4/1171    most recent
00512.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruce, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bruce, E. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bruce, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bruce, E. N.
Submitted on May 3, 2005
Accepted on December 1, 2005

Analysis of Factors That Influence Carbon Monoxide Uptake, Distribution, and Washout from Blood and Extravascular Tissues Using a Multicompartment Model

Margaret C. Bruce1 and Eugene N. Bruce2*

1 Department of Physiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
2 Center for Biomedical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ebruce{at}uky.edu.

To better understand factors that influence carbon monoxide (CO) washout rates, we utilized a multicompartment mathematical model to predict rates of CO uptake; distribution in vascular and extravascular (muscle versus other soft tissue) compartments; and washout over a range of exposure and washout conditions with varied subject-specific parameters. We fitted this model to experimental data from 15 human subjects, for whom subject-specific parameters were known, multiple washout COHb levels were available, and CO-exposure conditions were identical, to investigate the contributions of exposure conditions and individual variability to CO washout from blood. We found that CO washout from venous blood was biphasic and that post-exposure times at which COHb samples were obtained significantly influenced the calculated CO half-times (P<0.0001). The first, more rapid, phase of CO washout from the blood reflected the loss of CO to the expired air and to a slow uptake by the muscle compartment, whereas the second, slower washout phase was attributable to CO flow from the muscle compartment back to the blood and removal from blood via the expired air. When the model was used to predict the effects of varying exposure conditions for these subjects, the CO exposure duration, concentration, peak COHb levels, and subject-specific parameters each influenced washout half-times. Blood volume divided by ventilation correlated better with half-time predictions than did cardiac output, muscle mass, or ventilation, but explained only ~50% of half-time variability. Thus, exposure conditions, COHb sampling times, and individual parameters should be considered when estimating CO washout rates for poisoning victims.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.