Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 30, 2006). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00511.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/3/904    most recent
00511.2006v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, J. M
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, J. M
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, L. S.
Submitted on May 4, 2006
Accepted on November 24, 2006

Left Ventricular Function During Arm Exercise: Influence of Leg Cycling and Lower Body Positive Pressure

Jack M Goodman1*, Michael R Freeman2, and Leonard Steven Goodman3

1 Faculty of Physical Education and Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; University of Toronto, Heart and Stroke/Richard Lewar Centre, Toronto, Canada
2 Cardiovascular Medicine and Nuclear Cardiology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
3 Directorate Science & Technology Policy, Defence Research & Development Canada, Ottawa, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jack.goodman{at}utoronto.ca.

The purpose of this study was to characterize LV diastolic filling and systolic performance during graded arm exercise and to examine the effects of LBPP or concomitant leg exercise as means to enhance LV preload, in aerobically-trained individuals. Subjects were 8 males with a mean age (±SEM) of 26.8 ±1.2 years. Peak exercise testing was first performed for both legs ( VO2max=4.21 ±0.19 l/min) and arms (2.56±0.16 l/min). On a separate occasion, left ventricular (LV) filling and ejection parameters were acquired using non-imaging scintography using in-vivo RBC labeling with technetium 99m first during leg exercise performed in succession for 2 minutes at increasing grades to peak effort. Graded arm exercise (at 30, 60, 80 and 100% VO2peak) was performed during three randomly assigned conditions: control (no intervention), with concurrent leg cycling (at a constant 15% leg VO2max) or with 60 mmHg of lower body positive pressure using an Anti G suit. Peak leg exercise LV ejection fraction was higher than arm exercise (60.9±1.7% vs. 55.9±2.7%, p<.05), as was peak LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) reported as % of resting value (110.3±4.4% vs. 97±3.7%, p<.05) and peak filling rate (EDV/s; 6.4±0.28 vs. 5.2±0.25%). Concomitant use of either low-intensity leg exercise or LBPP during arm exercise failed to significantly increase LV filling characteristics or ejection parameters. These observations suggest that perturbations in preload fail to overcome the inherent hemodynamic conditions present during arm exercise which attenuate LV performance.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.