Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Renal Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (February 7, 2003). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00502.2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/6/2119    most recent
00502.2002v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riely, R. R
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riely, R. R
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A.
Submitted on June 10, 2002
Accepted on January 22, 2003

Speech Movements Do Not Scale by Orofacial Structure Size

Rachel R Riely1 and Anne Smith1*

1 Department of Audiology and Speech Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: asmith{at}purdue.edu.

The potential role of a size scaling principle in orofacial movements for speech was examined using between-groups (adults vs. 5-year-old children) as well as within-group, correlational analyses. Movements of the lower lip and jaw were recorded during speech production, and anthropometric measures of orofacial structures were made. Adult females produced speech movements of equal amplitude and velocity to those of adult males. The children produced speech movement amplitudes equal to those of adults; but they had significantly lower peak velocities of orofacial movement. Thus we found no evidence supporting a size scaling principle for orofacial speech movements. Young children have a relatively large-amplitude, low-velocity movement strategy for speech production compared to young adults. This strategy may reflect the need for more time to plan speech movement sequences and an increased reliance on sensory feedback as young children develop speech motor control processes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
L. Goffman, A. Smith, L. Heisler, and M. Ho
The Breadth of Coarticulatory Units in Children and Adults
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2008; 51(6): 1424 - 1437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.