Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (August 10, 2006). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00440.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/6/1616    most recent
00440.2006v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reeves, G. V
Right arrow Articles by Castracane, V. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reeves, G. V
Right arrow Articles by Castracane, V. D.
Submitted on April 14, 2006
Accepted on August 8, 2006

Comparison of Hormone Responses Following Light Resistance Exercise with Partial Vascular Occlusion and Moderate Resistance Exercise Without Occlusion

Gregory V Reeves1, Robert R Kraemer1*, Daniel B Hollander1, Jordan Clavier1, Craig Thomas1, Michelle Francois1, and V. Daniel Castracane2

1 Kinesiology and Health Studies, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, Louisiana, United States
2 Foundation for Blood Research, Scarborough, Maine, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rkraemer{at}selu.edu.

Previous studies of contracting muscle with low loading and partial vascular occlusion demonstrated hypertrophy and strength adaptations similar to and exceeding those observed with traditional moderate to high resistance. The purpose of the study was to determine the anabolic and catabolic hormone responses to light resistance exercise combined with partial vascular occlusion. Three experimental conditions of light resistance with partial occlusion (LRO), moderate resistance with no occlusion (MR), and partial occlusion without exercise (OO) were performed by 8 healthy subjects (M±SD, 21±1.8 yrs). Three sets of single-arm biceps curls and single-leg calf presses were completed to failure with one-minute interset-rest periods. Workloads of 30% and 70% 1-RM for each exercise were lifted for the LRO and MR trials, respectively. Blood samples were taken pre, post, and 15 minutes post-exercise for each experimental condition. Lactate increased significantly in the LRO and MR trials and were not significantly different from each other at any time point. Growth hormone (GH) increased significantly by four-fold from pre to post-exercise in the LRO session but did not change significantly during this time period in the MR and OO trials (8.3±2.3 µg/L vs 2.1±1.2 and 2.6±0.94 µg/L, post-exercise, respectively, p<0.05). There were no changes in resting total testosterone (T; M ± SE; 15.7±1.6 nmol/L), free testosterone (FT; 54.1±4.5 pmol/L), or cortisol (267.6±22 nmol/L) across all trials and times. In conclusion, light exercise combined with partial vascular occlusion elicits a greater GH response than moderate exercise without occlusion, but does not affect T, FT, or cortisol.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. Fujita, T. Abe, M. J. Drummond, J. G. Cadenas, H. C. Dreyer, Y. Sato, E. Volpi, and B. B. Rasmussen
Blood flow restriction during low-intensity resistance exercise increases S6K1 phosphorylation and muscle protein synthesis
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2007; 103(3): 903 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.