Journal of Applied Physiology Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (October 8, 2004). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00430.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/2/512    most recent
00430.2004v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watson, R. A
Right arrow Articles by Pride, N. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watson, R. A
Right arrow Articles by Pride, N. B
Submitted on April 29, 2004
Accepted on September 30, 2004

POSTURAL CHANGES IN LUNG VOLUMES AND RESPIRATORY RESISTANCE IN SUBJECTS WITH OBESITY

Rosemary A Watson1 and Neil B Pride1*

1 Faculty of Medicine, Respiratory Medicine NHLI, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: n.pride{at}imperial.ac.uk.

Reduced functional residual capacity (FRC) is consistently found in obese subjects. In 10 obese subjects (mean (SEM) age 49.0(6)yr, weight 128.4(8)kg, BMI 44(3)kg.m-2) without respiratory disease, we have examined 1) supine changes in total lung capacity (TLC) and subdivisions; 2) whether values of total respiratory resistance (Rrs) are appropriate for mid-tidal lung volume (MTLV) and; 3) estimated resistance of the nasopharyngeal airway in both sitting and supine postures. The results were compared with those of 13 control subjects with BMI <27kg.m-2. Rrs at 6Hz was measured by applying forced oscillation at the mouth (Rrs,mo) or the nose (Rrs,na); resistance of the nasopharyngeal airway (Rnp) was estimated from the difference between sequential measurements of Rrs,mo and Rrs,na. All measurements were made when seated and when supine. Obese subjects when seated had a restrictive defect with low TLC and FRC/TLC ratio; when supine, TLC fell 80ml and FRC only 70ml, compared with a mean supine fall of FRC of 730ml in control subjects. Values of Rrs,mo and Rrs,na at resting MTLV in obese subjects were about twice that in control subjects in both postures. Relating total respiratory conductance (Grs = 1/Rrs) to MTLV, increase in Rrs,mo in obese subjects was only partly explained by their reduced MTLV. Rnp was increased in some obese subjects in both postures. Despite the increased extrapulmonary mass load in obese subjects further falls in TLC and FRC when supine were negligible. Rrs,mo at isovolume was increased. Further studies are needed to examine the causes of reduced TLC and increases in Rrs,mo and sometimes in Rnp in obese subjects.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. E. Peppard, N. R. Ward, and M. J. Morrell
The Impact of Obesity on Oxygen Desaturation during Sleep-disordered Breathing
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2009; 180(8): 788 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
R. L. Jones and M.-M. U. Nzekwu
The effects of body mass index on lung volumes.
Chest, September 1, 2006; 130(3): 827 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.