Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 30, 2006). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00425.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/3/992    most recent
00425.2006v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, T. C
Right arrow Articles by Sacco, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, T. C
Right arrow Articles by Sacco, P.
Submitted on April 11, 2006
Accepted on November 22, 2006

Intensity of eccentric exercise, shift of optimum angle and the magnitude of repeated bout effect

Trevor C Chen1, Kazunori Nosaka2*, and Paul Sacco3

1 Department of Physical Education, National Chiayi University, Chiayi County, Taiwan - Republic of China
2 School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
3 School of Health and Bioscience, University of East London, London, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: k.nosaka{at}ecu.edu.au.

This study compared the effect of four different intensities of initial eccentric exercise (ECC1) on optimum angle shift and extent of muscle damage induced by subsequent maximal eccentric exercise. Fifty-two male students were placed into 100%, 80%, 60%, or 40% groups (n=13 per group), performing 30 eccentric actions of the elbow flexors of 100%, 80%, 60%, or 40% of maximal isometric strength (MVC) for ECC1, followed 2-3 weeks later by a similar exercise (ECC2) which used 100% MVC load. MVC at six elbow joint angles, range of motion, upper arm circumference, serum creatine kinase activity, myoglobin concentration, and muscle soreness were measured before and for 5 days following ECC1 and ECC2. A rightward shift of optimum angle following ECC1 was significantly (P<0.05) greater for 100% and 80% than 60% and 40% groups, and decreased significantly (P<0.05) from immediately to 5 days post-exercise. By the time ECC2 was performed, only 100% group kept a significant shift (4°). Changes in most of the criterion measures following ECC1 were significantly greater for 100% and 80% groups compared with 60% and 40% groups. Changes in the criterion measures following ECC2 were significantly (P<0.05) greater for 40% group compared with other groups. Although the magnitude of repeated bout effect following ECC2 was significantly (P<0.05) smaller for 40% and 60% groups, all groups showed significantly (P<0.05) reduced changes in criterion measures following ECC2 in comparison to the ECC1 100% bout. We conclude that the repeated bout effect was not dependent on the shift of optimum angle.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. Jubeau, A. Sartorio, P. G. Marinone, F. Agosti, J. V. Hoecke, K. Nosaka, and N. A. Maffiuletti
Comparison between voluntary and stimulated contractions of the quadriceps femoris for growth hormone response and muscle damage
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2008; 104(1): 75 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.