Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (September 8, 2005). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00364.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/1/294    most recent
00364.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mansour, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Badr, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mansour, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Badr, M. S.
Submitted on March 30, 2005
Accepted on September 6, 2005

Measurement of Pharyngeal Cross-sectional Area using Finite Element Analysis

Khaled F. Mansour1, James A. Rowley1*, and M. Safwan Badr1

1 Sleep Research Laboratory, John D. Dingell VAMC, Detroit, MI, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jrowley{at}med.wayne.edu.

A noninvasive measurement of pharyngeal cross-sectional area (CSA) during sleep would be advantageous for research studies. We hypothesized that CSA could be calculated from the measured pharyngeal pressure and flow using finite element analysis (FEA). The retropalatal airway was visualized using a fiberoptic scope to obtain the measured CSA (mCSA). Flow was measured using a pneumotachometer and pharyngeal pressure was measured using a pressure catheter at the palatal rim. FEA was performed as follows: using a three-dimensional image of the upper airway, a mesh of finite elements was created. Specialized software was used to allow the simultaneous calculation of velocity and area for each element using the measured pressure and flow. In the development phase, 677 simultaneous measurements of CSA, pressure and flow from one subject during NREM and REM sleep were entered into the software to determine a series of equations, based upon the continuity and momentum equations, that could calculate the CSA (cCSA). In the validation phase, the final equations were used to calculate the CSA from 1767 simultaneous measurements of pressure and flow obtained during wakefulness, NREM and REM sleep from 14 subjects. In both phases, mCSA and cCSA were compared using Bland- Altman analysis. For the development breaths, the mean difference between mCSA and cCSA was 0.0 mm2 (95% CI, -0.1, 0.1 mm2). For the NREM validation breaths, the mean difference between mCSA and cCSA was 1.1 mm2 (95%CI 1.3, 1.5 mm2). Pharyngeal CSA can be accurately calculated from measured pharyngeal pressure and flow using FEA.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.